CVE-2013-6630
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe get_dht function in jdmarker.c in libjpeg-turbo through 1.3.0, as used in Google Chrome before 31.0.1650.48 and other products, does not set all elements of a certain Huffman value array during the reading of segments that follow Define Huffman Table (DHT) JPEG markers, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from uninitialized memory locations via a crafted JPEG image.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe get_dht function in jdmarker.c in libjpeg-turbo fails to fully initialize a Huffman value array when parsing Define Huffman Table (DHT) JPEG markers and subsequent segments. This causes uninitialized memory contents to be leaked to attackers via crafted JPEG images, resulting in potential information disclosure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 31.0.1650.47= 31.0.1650.0= 31.0.1650.2= 31.0.1650.3= 31.0.1650.4= 31.0.1650.5= 31.0.1650.6= 31.0.1650.7= 31.0.1650.8= 31.0.1650.9= 31.0.1650.10= 31.0.1650.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Google Chrome versionNavigate to chrome://settings/help or use 'Help > About Google Chrome' to view the installed version numberAffected if The installed version is 31.0.1650.47 or earlier, specifically any version from 31.0.1650.0 through 31.0.1650.47
-
Confirm libjpeg-turbo version (if accessible)Check the libjpeg-turbo library version included with Chrome. On Linux this may be found in /usr/lib or the Chrome application bundle. On Windows check the Chrome installation directory for jpeg*.dll or related librariesAffected if The bundled libjpeg-turbo library version is earlier than 1.3.1
-
Verify JPEG parsing behaviorAttempt to parse a specially crafted JPEG image containing Define Huffman Table (DHT) markers with abnormal table data. Monitor for unexpected memory contents in the output or process memoryAffected if Uninitialized memory contents appear in the output when processing JPEG files with non-standard DHT markers
-
Check for presence of vulnerable code pathIf source code is available, inspect the get_dht function in jdmarker.c for incomplete initialization of the Huffman value array. Look for instances where memset or initialization loops may be missing or insufficientAffected if The code shows the Huffman value array (bits/val arrays) are not fully zeroed before use in the get_dht function
A user is affected if their Google Chrome version is 31.0.1650.47 or earlier, or if the bundled libjpeg-turbo library is version 1.3.0 or earlier and they process untrusted JPEG images.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate libjpeg-turbo to version 1.3.1 or later, or update dependent products (e.g., Google Chrome to 31.0.1650.48 or later) to incorporate the patched library.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,864.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-6630 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- googlechromereleases.blogspot.com
- advisories.mageia.org
- archives.neohapsis.com
- git.chromium.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- secunia.com
- www.debian.org
- www.mandriva.com
- www.mozilla.org
- www.oracle.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- bugzilla.mozilla.org
- code.google.com
- security.gentoo.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-6630 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data