Wireless Lan ControllerHardware / appliance · Cisco

CVE-2013-6684

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-11-13
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The web framework on Cisco Wireless LAN Controller (WLC) devices does not properly validate configuration parameters, which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service via a crafted HTTP request, aka Bug ID CSCuh81011.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The Cisco Wireless LAN Controller web framework fails to properly validate configuration parameters, allowing any remote authenticated user to send specially crafted HTTP requests that trigger a denial of service condition.

MitigationApply the relevant Cisco patch for bug CSCuh81011. Until patched, limit WLC management access to only trusted, authenticated users and monitor for abnormal HTTP request patterns.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Wireless Lan ControllerHardware / appliance
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
Single
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Cisco WLC is in use
    Identify the device model via CLI (show sysinfo) or web interface. Look for 'Wireless LAN Controller' in the device identification.
    Affected if Device is a Cisco Wireless LAN Controller and web management is enabled
  2. Verify web management interface status
    Check via CLI: show run config | include http or show web-management status. Alternatively, check the WLC web interface is accessible on ports 80/443.
    Affected if HTTP/HTTPS web management is enabled and exposed
  3. Confirm management access scope
    Review ACLs or management interface bindings: show acl summary or show interface management. Determine if web management is reachable from untrusted networks.
    Affected if WLC web interface is accessible from untrusted or external networks rather than only trusted management VLANs
  4. Inspect for service degradation
    Check WLC operational status: show process cpu history, show client summary, show ap summary. Look for unexpected drops in client count or CPU spikes.
    Affected if WLC shows abnormal client disconnections, high CPU, or unresponsive web interface without known cause
  5. Review HTTP request logs
    Examine WLC logs or syslog for unusual HTTP patterns: debug ip http all (if enabled), or external syslog collection. Look for malformed or repetitive HTTP requests.
    Affected if Logs show abnormal HTTP request patterns from authenticated sessions that correlate with service issues

A Cisco WLC is affected if it has web management enabled and is accessible to remote authenticated users, especially from untrusted networks, and exhibits DoS symptoms or abnormal HTTP traffic.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the relevant Cisco patch for bug CSCuh81011. Until patched, limit WLC management access to only trusted, authenticated users and monitor for abnormal HTTP request patterns.

Fix this in Wireless Lan Controller Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,120
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-6684 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-6684 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data