CVE-2013-6710
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cisco WebEx Training Center allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors, aka Bug ID CSCul25567.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cisco WebEx Training Center allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims by tricking authenticated users into submitting malicious requests to the WebEx platform.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm WebEx Training Center deploymentIdentify if Cisco WebEx Training Center is hosted in your environment by accessing the WebEx URL and verifying the Training Center component is active. Check server response headers and application URLs for '/training/' paths or 'trainingcenter' in the hostname.Affected if WebEx Training Center is deployed and accessible without additional CSRF protections.
-
Inspect HTML forms for anti-CSRF tokensLog into WebEx Training Center as a valid user and use browser developer tools to view the source of state-changing forms (registration, user management, meeting creation). Look for hidden input fields containing random tokens, or check form action URLs for token parameters.Affected if Forms lack hidden CSRF token fields and rely solely on session cookies for authentication.
-
Verify session cookie SameSite attributeOpen browser developer tools, go to the Application/Storage tab, and examine the session cookies for the WebEx domain. Check if the SameSite attribute is set to 'Strict' or 'Lax', or is absent (which defaults to None in older browsers).Affected if Session cookies have no SameSite attribute set, allowing cross-origin requests to proceed.
-
Check for Origin/Referer header validationSubmit a cross-origin request to WebEx Training Center (using a tool like curl or Burp) with a mismatched Origin header. Observe if the request is rejected or accepted. Alternatively, review server-side logs for any header validation logic.Affected if Requests with mismatched Origin/Referer headers are processed without rejection, indicating lack of server-side CSRF protection.
-
Test state-changing operations via cross-origin requestCreate a proof-of-concept HTML page hosted on a different domain that automatically submits a form to the WebEx Training Center endpoint (such as changing user settings or joining a meeting). If the action succeeds without requiring re-authentication, CSRF protection is absent.Affected if Cross-origin form submissions execute successfully without token validation or re-authentication.
If WebEx Training Center is deployed and forms lack anti-CSRF tokens, session cookies lack SameSite attributes, and the server does not validate Origin/Referer headers, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2013-6710.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) for all state-changing operations in WebEx Training Center, and validate the Origin/Referer headers on server-side requests to prevent unauthorized cross-origin requests.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-6710 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-6710 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data