PloneApplication

CVE-2013-7061

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-05-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
61/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Products/CMFPlone/CatalogTool.py in Plone 3.3 through 4.3.2 allows remote administrators to bypass restrictions and obtain sensitive information via an unspecified search API.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

An access control bypass vulnerability in Products/CMFPlone/CatalogTool.py allows authenticated remote administrators to bypass intended restrictions and retrieve sensitive information through the search API in Plone versions 3.3 through 4.3.2.

MitigationUpgrade to Plone 4.3.3 or later, or apply the vendor patch to fix the access control logic in the CatalogTool.py search functionality.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
PloneApplication
Affected:= 3.3= 3.3.1= 3.3.2= 3.3.3= 3.3.4= 3.3.5= 3.3.6= 4.0= 4.0.1= 4.0.2= 4.0.3= 4.0.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
Single
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Plone version
    Check the installed Plone version by inspecting the eggs or portal_migration. In a Plone site, go to Site Setup > Version and check the Plone version, or check the buildout/egg versions installed in the Python environment.
    Affected if The installed version is between 3.3 and 4.3.2 inclusive, specifically 3.3.x or 4.0.x through 4.0.4 as listed in the affected versions.
  2. Verify CatalogTool.py search API is available
    Confirm the Products.CMFPlone package is installed and the CatalogTool.py module exists in the installation. This is typically found in the Plone egg under Products/CMFPlone/CatalogTool.py.
    Affected if The CatalogTool.py module exists and the Plone search API (portal_catalog) is accessible to authenticated users.
  3. Confirm administrator-level access exists
    Check if there are any user accounts with Administrator role in the Plone site. Use the ZMI (Zope Management Interface) at /manage_main or check portal_membership for users with Manager or Administrator roles.
    Affected if There is at least one authenticated administrator/manager account that could potentially exploit this bypass.
  4. Inspect search API access controls
    Review the CatalogTool.py search method in the installed Products.CMFPlone package. The vulnerability allows bypass of role-based restrictions on search results. Check if the search method properly enforces access controls on returned objects.
    Affected if The search method does not properly restrict access to sensitive content based on user roles, allowing administrators to see content they should not access.

A Plone installation is affected if it runs version 3.3.x or 4.0.x through 4.0.4, has the search API accessible to authenticated administrators, and the CatalogTool.py search method lacks proper role-based access control enforcement.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to Plone 4.3.3 or later, or apply the vendor patch to fix the access control logic in the CatalogTool.py search functionality.

Fix this in Plone Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,480
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,568.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-7061 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-7061 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data