CVE-2013-7062
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Zope, as used in Plone 3.3.x through 3.3.6, 4.0.x through 4.0.9, 4.1.x through 4.1.6, 4.2.x through 4.2.7, and 4.3 through 4.3.2, allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified input in the (1) browser_id_manager or (2) OFS.Image method.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Zope framework allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified input in the browser_id_manager or OFS.Image method. The vulnerability affects Plone versions 3.3.x through 3.3.6, 4.0.x through 4.0.9, 4.1.x through 4.1.6, 4.2.x through 4.2.7, and 4.3 through 4.3.2.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.3.0, <= 3.3.6>= 4.0.0, <= 4.0.9>= 4.1.0, <= 4.1.6>= 4.2.0, <= 4.2.7>= 4.3.0, <= 4.3.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Plone versionLocate the version file or use the Zope/Plone management interface (ZMI) at /manage to view the product version. Common locations include portal_migration in the Plone control panel or the versions.cfg file in the Plone buildout directory.Affected if The installed Plone version falls within 3.3.0-3.3.6, 4.0.0-4.0.9, 4.1.0-4.1.6, 4.2.0-4.2.7, or 4.3.0-4.3.2
-
Verify browser_id_manager component is accessibleAccess the Zope Management Interface (ZMI) and navigate to the browser_id_manager object in the Zope root or check if the component is loaded in the site configuration. This is typically found under the 'browser_id_manager' id in the Zope object hierarchy.Affected if The browser_id_manager component exists and accepts user-supplied input without proper sanitization, allowing XSS injection via unspecified parameters.
-
Check OFS.Image method exposureInspect the OFS.Image module in the Zope installation to determine if the vulnerable method (typically related to image display or handling) is exposed to web requests. This may involve checking the method permissions and traversal in the ZMI.Affected if The OFS.Image method is accessible via web and accepts unsanitized input, permitting script injection.
-
Confirm web-facing access to vulnerable endpointsDetermine if the Plone site is exposed to the internet or accessible to untrusted users. Test by accessing typical paths like /manage (ZMI) or observing whether the Plone site allows anonymous or unauthenticated interactions with the affected components.Affected if The Plone instance is accessible to remote users who can interact with the browser_id_manager or OFS.Image components without authentication or with low-privilege accounts.
Your environment is affected if you are running any Plone version from 3.3.0 through 3.3.6, 4.0.0 through 4.0.9, 4.1.0 through 4.1.6, 4.2.0 through 4.2.7, or 4.3.0 through 4.3.2, AND the browser_id_manager or OFS.Image components are accessible to users who can inject malicious scripts.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version of Plone (4.3.3 or later for the 4.3 branch, or corresponding patched versions for earlier branches) that addresses the XSS vulnerabilities in Zope's browser_id_manager and OFS.Image components.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-7062 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-7062 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data