CVE-2013-7205
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOff-by-one error in the process_cgivars function in contrib/daemonchk.c in Nagios Core 3.5.1, 4.0.2, and earlier allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information from process memory or cause a denial of service (crash) via a long string in the last key value in the variable list, which triggers a heap-based buffer over-read.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn off-by-one error in the process_cgivars function in Nagios Core's contrib/daemonchk.c allows remote authenticated users to trigger a heap-based buffer over-read by supplying an excessively long string in the last key value of the variable list. This can lead to sensitive information disclosure from process memory or cause a denial of service via crash.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 4.0.2= 3.0= 3.0.1= 3.0.2= 3.0.3= 3.0.4= 3.0.5= 3.0.6= 3.1.0= 3.1.1= 3.1.2= 3.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Nagios Core versionRun 'nagios --version' or check the version file in your Nagios installation directory (commonly /usr/local/nagios/etc/nagios.cfg or the RPM package version)Affected if The installed version is 3.0 through 3.2.0 (any of 3.0, 3.0.1, 3.0.2, 3.0.3, 3.0.4, 3.0.5, 3.0.6, 3.1.0, 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.2.0) or any version 4.0.2 or earlier
-
Confirm daemonchk functionality is presentCheck if the contrib/daemonchk.c source file exists in your Nagios installation, or if the compiled daemonchk utility is present in the sbin or bin directoryAffected if The daemonchk utility or its source exists in the Nagios contrib directory and is accessible to authenticated users
-
Verify CGI interface is enabledCheck if the Nagios CGI web interface is enabled and accessible - look for status.cgi, history.cgi, or other CGI executables in the sbin directory (commonly /usr/local/nagios/sbin/)Affected if The CGI interface is enabled and accessible via the web server to authenticated users, as process_cgivars processes CGI variable input
-
Check remote authentication statusReview your web server and Nagios authentication configuration (check nagios.conf and .htaccess or authentication settings in cgi.cfg) to determine if remote user authentication is required for CGI scriptsAffected if Remote authenticated users can access the Nagios CGI interface, as the vulnerability requires a remote authenticated user to supply the malformed input
-
Inspect CGI parameter handling logsReview web server access logs and Nagios logs for requests to CGI scripts with unusually long parameter values, particularly in the last key-value pair of CGI variable stringsAffected if Unusually long string values appear in CGI variable inputs in web server logs, indicating potential exploitation attempts
You are affected if your Nagios Core version falls within 3.0-3.2.0 or 4.0.2 and earlier, the daemonchk functionality is present, and the CGI interface is accessible to remote authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version of Nagios Core (3.5.2, 4.0.3, or later). If upgrading is not immediately feasible, limit access to the daemonchk functionality to trusted authenticated users only and monitor for anomalous behavior.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-7205 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-7205 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data