Simple Machines ForumApplication · Simplemachines

CVE-2013-7235

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-04-29
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.1.9 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Simple Machines Forum (SMF) before 1.1.19 and 2.x before 2.0.6 allows remote attackers to impersonate arbitrary users via multiple space characters characters.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Simple Machines Forum (SMF) before versions 1.1.19 and 2.0.6 contains a username handling flaw where multiple space characters in a username are processed incorrectly during authentication. This allows remote attackers to register usernames that appear identical to existing privileged users (by padding with spaces), enabling impersonation and unauthorized access to arbitrary accounts.

MitigationUpgrade SMF to version 1.1.19 or 2.0.6 or later to patch the username validation flaw. Review user accounts for usernames containing unusual spacing patterns after patching.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Simple Machines ForumApplication
Affected:<= 1.1.9= 1.0= 1.0.1= 1.0.2= 1.0.3= 1.0.4= 1.0.5= 1.0.6= 1.0.7= 1.0.8= 1.0.9= 1.0.10

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify SMF version
    Log into the SMF admin panel and navigate to Admin > Server Settings > General, or check the version.php file in the forum root directory for the $forum_version variable
    Affected if The installed version is 1.0.x (any version) or 1.1.x through 1.1.9, as these ranges contain the vulnerable code
  2. Query database for usernames with abnormal spacing
    Run a SQL query on the members table (typically smf_members or similar) to find usernames containing multiple consecutive spaces, leading spaces, or trailing spaces using: SELECT member_name FROM {db_prefix}members WHERE member_name LIKE '% %' OR member_name LIKE ' %' OR member_name LIKE '% '
    Affected if Any user accounts are returned by this query, indicating the vulnerability allowed such registrations
  3. Compare username lengths
    Execute a SQL query to identify duplicate member names when trimmed: SELECT TRIM(member_name), COUNT(*) FROM {db_prefix}members GROUP BY TRIM(member_name) HAVING COUNT(*) > 1
    Affected if This query returns any results, showing multiple accounts with the same name when whitespace is ignored - a sign of successful exploitation
  4. Review recent account registrations
    Check the members table for accounts created around the time of the vulnerability disclosure (2013) or during any suspicious period, looking for names with space characters
    Affected if Newly registered accounts contain space characters in the username field

You are affected if your SMF version is 1.0.x or 1.1.x through 1.1.9, or if your user database contains accounts with usernames containing leading, trailing, or multiple internal spaces.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.1.9
Interim mitigation

Upgrade SMF to version 1.1.19 or 2.0.6 or later to patch the username validation flaw. Review user accounts for usernames containing unusual spacing patterns after patching.

Fix this in Simple Machines Forum Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,580
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,128.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-7235 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-7235 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data