X2go ServerApplication · X2go

CVE-2013-7383

HIGH · 9.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-05-20
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 4.0.0.7 or later.
See remediation →
96/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
x2gocleansessions in X2Go Server before 4.0.0.8 and 4.0.1.x before 4.0.1.10 allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors, possibly related to backticks.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The x2gocleansessions script in X2Go Server versions before 4.0.0.8 and 4.0.1.x before 4.0.1.10 contains a command injection vulnerability, likely via unsanitized input executed through backticks in shell commands. This allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges.

MitigationUpgrade X2Go Server to version 4.0.0.8 or later (4.0.1.x to 4.0.1.10 or later). If immediate patching is not possible, restrict access to trusted authenticated users only and monitor for suspicious session activity.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
X2go ServerApplication
Affected:<= 4.0.0.7= 4.0.0.0= 4.0.0.1= 4.0.0.2= 4.0.0.3= 4.0.0.4= 4.0.0.6= 4.0.1.0= 4.0.1.1= 4.0.1.2= 4.0.1.3= 4.0.1.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
Single
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine installed X2Go Server version
    Run 'dpkg -l x2goserver' or 'rpm -q x2goserver' to retrieve the installed package version, or run 'x2gocleansessions --version' if available
    Affected if Version is 4.0.0.7 or earlier, or falls between 4.0.1.0 and 4.0.1.9 inclusive
  2. Locate the x2gocleansessions script
    Search for the script using 'find / -name x2gocleansessions 2>/dev/null' or check common paths like /usr/bin/x2gocleansessions
    Affected if The script exists on the system and is part of a vulnerable X2Go Server installation
  3. Verify script content for command injection vectors
    Examine the script with 'cat <path_to_x2gocleansessions>' and look for backtick commands or shell execution that process user-supplied input without sanitization
    Affected if The script contains unsanitized backtick expressions or system calls that could be manipulated through session input
  4. Check if X2Go Server service is exposed to untrusted networks
    Review network configuration and firewall rules to determine if the X2Go Server port (port 22 by default) is accessible from untrusted or public networks
    Affected if The X2Go service is reachable by remote authenticated users who could inject malicious input

You are affected if X2Go Server version is 4.0.0.7 or earlier, or between 4.0.1.0 and 4.0.1.9, and the x2gocleansessions script with vulnerable code is present and accessible to authenticated users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 4.0.0.7
Interim mitigation

Upgrade X2Go Server to version 4.0.0.8 or later (4.0.1.x to 4.0.1.10 or later). If immediate patching is not possible, restrict access to trusted authenticated users only and monitor for suspicious session activity.

Recommended fix High confidence

X2Go Server 4.0.0.8 or later (or 4.0.1.10 or later for 4.0.1.x branch)

  1. Upgrade X2Go Server to version 4.0.0.8 or later for the 4.0.0.x branch
  2. Alternatively, upgrade to version 4.0.1.10 or later for the 4.0.1.x branch
  3. After upgrading, verify the x2gocleansessions binary permissions and configuration

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in X2go Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-7383 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-7383 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data