Cloudforms 3.0 Management EngineApplication · Redhat

CVE-2014-0137

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-05-14
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 5.2.3 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SQL injection vulnerability in the saved_report_delete action in the ReportController in Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine (CFME) before 5.2.3.2 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors, related to MiqReportResult.exists.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SQL injection in the saved_report_delete action of Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine's ReportController allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. The vulnerability is associated with the MiqReportResult.exists method, indicating the application fails to properly sanitize input before using it in a database query.

MitigationUpgrade to CloudForms Management Engine version 5.2.3.2 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict access to the saved_report_delete functionality to only trusted users and implement additional input validation at the application layer.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Cloudforms 3.0 Management EngineApplication
Affected:<= 5.2.3= 5.2= 5.2.1= 5.2.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
Single
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine is installed
    Look for the CloudForms Management Engine installation. Common locations include /var/www/miq/vmdb or check for the presence of the 'vmdb' directory. The application typically runs as a Ruby on Rails application.
    Affected if The product is not installed - if CloudForms is not present, this CVE does not apply.
  2. Determine the installed version of CloudForms Management Engine
    Check the version file typically found at /var/www/miq/vmdb/VERSION or run 'cat /var/www/miq/vmdb/VERSION' if the standard installation path exists. Alternatively, check the About page in the CloudForms web interface.
    Affected if The version is 5.2, 5.2.1, 5.2.2, or any version <= 5.2.3. If the version is 5.2.3.2 or later, the system is not affected by this specific CVE.
  3. Verify the saved_report_delete functionality is accessible
    Confirm that the ReportController's saved_report_delete action is enabled. This action is typically accessed via the web interface under the Reports section. Check if the /reports/saved_report_delete URL endpoint responds.
    Affected if The vulnerability requires authenticated access to the saved_report_delete action. If this functionality is not accessible or has been removed, the exploit cannot be triggered.
  4. Inspect MiqReportResult.exists method usage in ReportController
    Review the Ruby code in the ReportController for the saved_report_delete action. Look for calls to MiqReportResult.exists? method where user-supplied parameters are passed directly to the database query without proper sanitization.
    Affected if The code uses MiqReportResult.exists with unsanitized user input from the saved_report_delete parameters. This indicates the vulnerable code path is present.

A system is affected if it runs Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine versions 5.2 through 5.2.3 (inclusive) and has the saved_report_delete functionality accessible to authenticated users with the vulnerable MiqReportResult.exists call present in the code.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 5.2.3
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to CloudForms Management Engine version 5.2.3.2 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict access to the saved_report_delete functionality to only trusted users and implement additional input validation at the application layer.

Fix this in Cloudforms 3.0 Management Engine Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-0137 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-0137 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data