CVE-2014-0212
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedqpid-cpp: ACL policies only loaded if the acl-file option specified enabling DoS by consuming all available file descriptors
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIn qpid-cpp (Apache Qpid C++ message broker), ACL (Access Control List) policies are only loaded when the acl-file option is explicitly specified in the configuration. When this option is not set, no ACL enforcement occurs, leaving the broker unprotected. This default behavior enables an attacker to cause a Denial of Service by consuming all available file descriptors without any access controls being applied.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify qpid-cpp installationLocate the qpid-cpp broker binary and confirm it is installed (e.g., which qpidd, rpm -q qpid-cpp, or ps aux | grep qpidd)Affected if qpid-cpp is installed and running but no acl-file option is configured
-
Locate broker configurationFind the configuration file used by the broker (commonly /etc/qpid/qpidd.conf or similar), or check the process command line argumentsAffected if Configuration file exists but does not contain an acl-file directive
-
Check for acl-file optionInspect the configuration file and any command-line arguments for the acl-file option (e.g., grep -i acl-file <configfile> or ps aux | grep qpidd)Affected if The acl-file option is not present or not set to a valid ACL policy file path
-
Verify ACL enforcement is activeIf acl-file is set, confirm the specified ACL file exists and the broker is enforcing ACL rules (e.g., check broker logs for ACL loading, or test with an unauthorized request)Affected if ACL file is not explicitly configured, meaning no access control is being applied
You are affected if the qpid-cpp broker is running without the acl-file option explicitly configured in its configuration file or command line, leaving ACL enforcement completely disabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataConfigure the acl-file option to explicitly load ACL policies, or modify the code to enforce ACL by default rather than requiring explicit configuration.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-0212 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-0212 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data