CVE-2014-0229
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedApache Hadoop 0.23.x before 0.23.11 and 2.x before 2.4.1, as used in Cloudera CDH 5.0.x before 5.0.2, do not check authorization for the (1) refreshNamenodes, (2) deleteBlockPool, and (3) shutdownDatanode HDFS admin commands, which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (DataNodes shutdown) or perform unnecessary operations by issuing a command.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThree HDFS admin commands (refreshNamenodes, deleteBlockPool, shutdownDatanode) in Apache Hadoop 0.23.x before 0.23.11 and 2.x before 2.4.1 bypass authorization checks, allowing any authenticated user to trigger DataNode shutdown or unnecessary operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 0.23.0= 0.23.1= 0.23.3= 0.23.4= 0.23.5= 0.23.6= 0.23.7= 0.23.8= 0.23.9= 0.23.10= 2.0.0= 2.0.1= 5.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Hadoop versionRun 'hadoop version' to display the installed Hadoop version numberAffected if Version is 0.23.x before 0.23.11, or 2.x before 2.4.1, or CDH 5.0.0 (exact versions: 0.23.0-0.23.10, 2.0.0-2.0.1, 2.1.0-2.4.0)
-
Confirm HDFS is the filesystem in useCheck core-site.xml for 'fs.defaultFS' property or run 'hdfs getconf -confKey fs.defaultFS' to see if HDFS is configuredAffected if fs.defaultFS points to hdfs:// (HDFS is active)
-
Verify the three vulnerable admin commands existRun 'hdfs dfsadmin -help refreshNamenodes', 'hdfs dfsadmin -help deleteBlockPool', and 'hdfs dfsadmin -help shutdownDatanode' to confirm these commands are availableAffected if All three commands are available and respond to -help without authorization errors
You are affected if your Hadoop version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND HDFS is your active filesystem, allowing any authenticated user to execute these admin commands without proper authorization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to Hadoop 0.23.11+, 2.4.1+, or CDH 5.0.2+ to include the authorization checks for these admin commands.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-0229 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-0229 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data