CVE-2014-0683
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe web management interface on the Cisco RV110W firewall with firmware 1.2.0.9 and earlier, RV215W router with firmware 1.1.0.5 and earlier, and CVR100W router with firmware 1.0.1.19 and earlier does not prevent replaying of modified authentication requests, which allows remote attackers to obtain administrative access by leveraging the ability to intercept requests, aka Bug IDs CSCul94527, CSCum86264, and CSCum86275.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe web management interface on Cisco RV110W, RV215W, and CVR100W devices lacks protection against authentication replay attacks. The interface does not implement anti-replay mechanisms such as session tokens, nonces, or timestamp validation, allowing an attacker who intercepts a valid authentication request to replay it and gain administrative access without knowing credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.2.0.9all versions<= 1.1.0.5all versions<= 1.0.1.19all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device model and firmware versionAccess the device web interface or check the administrative console to view the device status or system information page. Look for the model number (RV110W, RV215W, or CVR100W) and firmware version displayed.Affected if The device is a Cisco RV110W, RV215W, or CVR100W with firmware version 1.2.0.9 or lower for RV110W, 1.1.0.5 or lower for RV215W, or 1.0.1.19 or lower for CVR100W.
-
Confirm web management interface is enabledNavigate to the device web interface Administration or Management settings. Look for options named 'Web Management', 'HTTP/HTTPS Management', or 'Remote Management'. Verify the status shows it is enabled.Affected if The web management interface is enabled on the device.
-
Check if remote WAN access is permittedIn the device web interface, examine the remote management settings. Look for options controlling access from WAN or external networks. Determine if HTTP or HTTPS management is allowed from outside the local network.Affected if Remote (WAN) access to the web management interface is permitted.
-
Review authentication logs for replay patternsAccess the device logs or monitoring section. Search for multiple successful administrative logins from the same source IP address occurring within a very short time window (seconds apart), which could indicate replay attacks.Affected if Multiple identical authentication requests or simultaneous logins from the same source are observed in the logs.
The device is affected if it is a Cisco RV110W, RV215W, or CVR100W with firmware at or below the affected version thresholds and the web management interface is enabled and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade firmware to versions newer than 1.2.0.9 (RV110W), 1.1.0.5 (RV215W), or 1.0.1.19 (CVR100W). Until patched, restrict web management interface access to trusted networks only and disable remote management on WAN interfaces if not needed.
RV110W: upgrade to firmware 1.2.1.0 or later; RV215W: upgrade to firmware 1.1.0.6 or later; CVR100W: upgrade to firmware 1.0.1.20 or later
- 1. Identify the exact model number (RV110W, RV215W, or CVR100W) of your Cisco device
- 2. Access the device's web management interface
- 3. Navigate to Administration > Firmware Upgrade or similar menu
- 4. Download the appropriate fixed firmware from Cisco's official support site
- 5. Upload and apply the firmware update to the device
- 6. After reboot, verify the new firmware version is installed
- 7. Change administrative passwords as a precaution since authentication was compromised
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-0683 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-0683 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data