Ucs DirectorApplication · Cisco

CVE-2014-0709

HIGH · 9.3 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-02-22
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 4.0.0.2 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cisco UCS Director (formerly Cloupia) before 4.0.0.3 has a hardcoded password for the root account, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain administrative access via an SSH session to the CLI interface, aka Bug ID CSCui73930.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Cisco UCS Director before version 4.0.0.3 contains a hardcoded password for the root account. An attacker with network access to the SSH service can use this known credential to authenticate as root and gain full administrative control over the system.

MitigationUpgrade to Cisco UCS Director version 4.0.0.3 or later. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, restrict SSH access to the CLI interface using network ACLs or firewall rules to prevent unauthorized external access.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ucs DirectorApplication
Affected:<= 4.0.0.2= 4.0.0.0= 4.0.0.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Cisco UCS Director version
    Access the administrative UI or use the 'show version' command in the CLI to determine the installed version of Cisco UCS Director
    Affected if The version is 4.0.0.0, 4.0.0.1, or any version <= 4.0.0.2 (versions prior to 4.0.0.3)
  2. Verify SSH service status
    Check if the SSH service is enabled and listening on the Cisco UCS Director system. This can be done via the UI under Admin > Services or by attempting to connect to port 22
    Affected if SSH service is enabled and reachable from a network where potential attackers exist
  3. Assess network exposure of SSH
    Review firewall rules, ACLs, or network segmentation to determine if TCP port 22 (SSH) is accessible from untrusted networks
    Affected if SSH port 22 is exposed to networks outside the trusted administrative zone, allowing external attackers to reach the service

You are affected if Cisco UCS Director version is 4.0.0.2 or earlier AND SSH service is accessible from a network where untrusted users could attempt authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 4.0.0.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Cisco UCS Director version 4.0.0.3 or later. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, restrict SSH access to the CLI interface using network ACLs or firewall rules to prevent unauthorized external access.

Recommended fix High confidence

Cisco UCS Director 4.0.0.3 or later

  1. Backup current Cisco UCS Director configuration and database
  2. Download Cisco UCS Director version 4.0.0.3 or later from Cisco Systems
  3. Follow Cisco's documented upgrade procedure for UCS Director (typically via the Administration > System Management > Software Update menu in the GUI or via CLI)
  4. After successful upgrade, immediately change the root account password from the default using the CLI command 'set password' or via the administration interface
  5. Verify SSH access works with the new credentials and confirm the hardcoded password no longer functions
  6. Validate that all services are running correctly after upgrade
Caveat Review Cisco release notes for 4.0.0.3 for any known compatibility issues or migration requirements before upgrading

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Ucs Director Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-0709 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-0709 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data