Websphere CommerceApplication · Ibm

CVE-2014-0943

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-05-25
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM WebSphere Commerce 6.0 Feature Pack 2 through Feature Pack 5, 7.0.0.0 through 7.0.0.8, and 7.0 Feature Pack 1 through Feature Pack 7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption and daemon crash) via a malformed id parameter in a request.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM WebSphere Commerce fails to properly validate the id parameter in HTTP requests, allowing remote attackers to send malformed input that causes excessive resource consumption and ultimately daemon crash, resulting in denial of service.

MitigationApply IBM WebSphere Commerce security patches or upgrade to a non-vulnerable version. Consider implementing WAF rules to filter malformed id parameter requests as a temporary mitigation until patching is completed.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Websphere CommerceApplication
Affected:= 6.0.0.0= 7.0= 7.0.0.1= 7.0.0.2= 7.0.0.3= 7.0.0.4= 7.0.0.5= 7.0.0.6= 7.0.0.7= 7.0.0.8

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify IBM WebSphere Commerce is installed
    Check for the product installation directory (commonly at /opt/IBM/WebSphere or C:\IBM\WebSphere) or look for the 'WebSphere Commerce' process running on the server.
    Affected if The product is present on the system.
  2. Identify the installed version
    Locate the version file in the installation directory, typically found in the bin or properties subdirectory, or access the WebSphere Commerce Administration Console and view the system information page.
    Affected if The version matches any of: 6.0.0.0, 7.0, 7.0.0.1, 7.0.0.2, 7.0.0.3, 7.0.0.4, 7.0.0.5, 7.0.0.6, 7.0.0.7, or 7.0.0.8.
  3. Confirm web storefront is accessible
    Check if the HTTP or HTTPS port used by WebSphere Commerce (commonly port 80, 443, 8080, or 9443) is listening and reachable by running 'netstat -an | grep <port>' or attempting to access the storefront URL.
    Affected if The web interface is exposed and accepting HTTP requests.
  4. Verify the id parameter handler is active
    The vulnerability affects the id parameter in HTTP requests to the Commerce web modules. Confirm the Store or Accelerator web application is deployed and running by checking the WebSphere Application Server admin console or examining the deployed WAR files.
    Affected if The web storefront modules are deployed and running.

If the installed IBM WebSphere Commerce version matches 6.0.0.0, 7.0, or any 7.0.0.x through 7.0.0.8 AND the web storefront is accessible, the environment is affected by this CVE.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply IBM WebSphere Commerce security patches or upgrade to a non-vulnerable version. Consider implementing WAF rules to filter malformed id parameter requests as a temporary mitigation until patching is completed.

Fix this in Websphere Commerce Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,560
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-0943 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-0943 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data