CVE-2014-10002
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in JetBrains TeamCity before 8.1 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unknown vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · low confidenceThis is an information disclosure vulnerability in JetBrains TeamCity CI/CD server versions prior to 8.1. The vulnerability allows remote unauthenticated attackers to obtain sensitive information through unspecified vectors. TeamCity is a widely-used continuous integration and build management tool, making this a potentially serious information leak in build infrastructure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 8.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed TeamCity versionAccess the TeamCity web interface and navigate to Administration > Server Configuration, or check the version.txt file in the TeamCity data directory. The version is typically displayed on the login page footer or in the server administration panel.Affected if The displayed version number is 8.0 or lower (e.g., 8.0, 7.1, 7.0, 6.x)
-
Confirm version via command lineIf you have shell access to the TeamCity server, check the version using the TeamCity version helper: run 'java -jar [TeamCity_home]/bin/version.jar' or examine the TeamCity build agent configuration files.Affected if The command output or config file shows a version <= 8.0
-
Verify unauthenticated access is possibleTest remote access to the TeamCity web interface without providing credentials. Attempt to access common endpoints like the login page, REST API, or diagnostic pages without authentication.Affected if The server responds with sensitive information, build configurations, or allows access to administrative functions without any login credentials
-
Check server configuration for authentication settingsExamine the TeamCity main-config.xml or security-config.xml files in the TeamCity data directory for authentication provider settings. Look for 'requirePasswordChange' or 'requireRegistration' settings.Affected if Authentication is disabled or relaxed, allowing unauthenticated access to sensitive endpoints
A user is affected if their installed TeamCity version is 8.0 or earlier AND the server is accessible to unauthenticated remote attackers who can retrieve sensitive information through the web interface or API.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade JetBrains TeamCity to version 8.1 or later to remediate this vulnerability. As a critical infrastructure component, ensure proper testing in a staging environment before production deployment.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-10002 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-10002 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data