CVE-2014-10050
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Mobile MSM8996, MSM8939, MSM8976, MSM8917, SDM845, and SDM660, access control collision vulnerability when accessing the replay protected memory block.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAccess control collision vulnerability in the Replay Protected Memory Block (RPMB) partition of specific Qualcomm Snapdragon processors (MSM8996, MSM8939, MSM8976, MSM8917, SDM845, SDM660). RPMB is a hardware-secured storage area typically used for sensitive data like DRM keys and secure boot credentials; the collision allows potential unauthorized access to this protected memory region.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Snapdragon SoC modelCheck the processor model via /proc/cpuinfo, or use 'getprop ro.board.platform' or 'getprop ro.hardware' on Android devicesAffected if The model number matches one of: MSM8996, MSM8939, MSM8976, MSM8917, SDM845, or SDM660
-
Verify RPMB partition accessibilityCheck if the RPMB partition exists and is accessible on the device by examining /dev/block/*/rpmb or using 'ls -la /dev/rpmb*'Affected if RPMB device node exists and shows read/write access without proper authentication constraints
-
Check Android security patch levelRun 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' to retrieve the installed Android security patch dateAffected if The patch level is earlier than 2018-04-05 or is not set, indicating the vendor firmware update has not been applied
-
Confirm firmware versionQuery the baseband or modem firmware version via 'getprop gsm.version.baseband' or check the bootloader version via 'getprop ro.bootloader'Affected if The firmware version is present and corresponds to the affected Snapdragon variants listed, regardless of specific version number since all versions are vulnerable
The device is affected if it contains any of the listed Snapdragon processors (MSM8996, MSM8939, MSM8976, MSM8917, SDM845, SDM660) and the Android security patch level is earlier than 2018-04-05 or the vendor firmware update has not been applied.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-supplied firmware/BIOS updates delivered through Android security patch levels dated 2018-04-05 or later for affected devices. No user-configurable mitigation available; this is a hardware/firmware-level access control flaw requiring vendor patch deployment.
Android devices with security patch level 2018-04-05 or later containing the Qualcomm firmware fix
- Check the current Android security patch level on the device (Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level)
- If the security patch level is earlier than 2018-04-05, apply the latest available Android system update from your device manufacturer
- Verify after update that the security patch level shows 2018-04-05 or later
- For enterprise/embedded deployments, contact the device OEM for firmware-level updates if OTA updates are unavailable
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-10050 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-10050 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data