Charge 2 FirmwareOperating system · Fitbit

CVE-2014-10374

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2019-07-15
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
70/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
On Fitbit activity-tracker devices, certain addresses never change. According to the popets-2019-0036.pdf document, this leads to "permanent trackability" and "considerable privacy concerns" without a user-accessible anonymization feature. The devices, such as Charge 2, transmit Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) advertising packets with a TxAdd flag indicating random addresses, but the addresses remain constant. If devices come within BLE range at one or more locations where an adversary has set up passive sniffing, the adversary can determine whether the same device has entered one of these locations.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Fitbit activity trackers (including Charge 2) transmit BLE advertising packets with a TxAdd flag indicating random addresses, but the addresses remain constant over time. This allows permanent device tracking when adversaries with passive BLE sniffers monitor devices at multiple locations.

MitigationThis is a firmware-level vulnerability requiring a fix from Fitbit. Users should check for and apply device firmware updates when available. Until a fix is released, users should be aware of tracking risks in public spaces with BLE monitoring.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Charge 2 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the Fitbit device model
    Check the physical device for the model name/number, or view paired device details in the Fitbit app or computer pairing settings
    Affected if The device is a Fitbit Charge 2
  2. Enable BLE scanning on a separate device
    Use a BLE sniffer app, a second BLE-enabled device with scanning capability (such as a smartphone with a BLE scanner app or dedicated BLE analysis hardware), to discover and record advertising packets from the Fitbit device
    Affected if The Fitbit device is transmitting BLE advertising packets
  3. Capture multiple BLE advertising samples over time
    Record the BLE MAC address from advertising packets at different times (wait at least several minutes between captures) and compare the addresses observed
    Affected if The MAC address remains identical across samples taken at different times
  4. Verify the address type flag
    Examine the advertising packet data to check the TxAdd flag value (should be set to 1 for random addresses), then confirm if that random address stays the same across multiple advertising events
    Affected if The TxAdd flag indicates random addresses but the address value does not change over time

If the device is a Fitbit Charge 2 and the BLE MAC address remains constant across multiple advertising packets captured over time (despite the TxAdd flag indicating random addressing), the environment is affected by this tracking vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

This is a firmware-level vulnerability requiring a fix from Fitbit. Users should check for and apply device firmware updates when available. Until a fix is released, users should be aware of tracking risks in public spaces with BLE monitoring.

Fix this in Charge 2 Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,590
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,544.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-10374 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-10374 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data