CVE-2014-125017
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability classified as critical was found in FFmpeg 2.0. This vulnerability affects the function rpza_decode_stream. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. The attack can be initiated remotely. The name of the patch is Fixes Invalid Writes. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA memory corruption vulnerability in FFmpeg 2.0's rpza_decode_stream function allows remote attackers to cause invalid memory writes via crafted RPZA video files, leading to potential code execution or denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FFmpeg versionRun 'ffmpeg -version' or 'ffmpeg -buildconf' to display the version number and build informationAffected if The version displayed is exactly 2.0
-
Confirm RPZA decoder is presentRun 'ffmpeg -decoders' and search for 'rpza' in the output, or run 'ffmpeg -h decoder=rpza'Affected if The RPZA decoder is listed as available in the decoder list
-
Check build configuration for RPZA supportRun 'ffmpeg -configuration' or 'ffmpeg -buildconf' and verify if RPZA is explicitly enabled in the build flagsAffected if RPZA support is compiled into the binary and the version is 2.0
You are affected if FFmpeg version is exactly 2.0 and the RPZA decoder is available in your build.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor patch that fixes invalid writes in the rpza_decode_stream function, or update to a patched version of FFmpeg beyond 2.0.
Latest stable FFmpeg release (4.x or 5.x series, as FFmpeg 2.0 is from 2012)
- 1. Back up any existing FFmpeg 2.0 installations and configuration files.
- 2. Download the latest stable FFmpeg release from the official website (ffmpeg.org) or your distribution's package repository.
- 3. For source compilation: Clone the latest FFmpeg repository from git.videolan.org or download the current stable release tarball.
- 4. Compile and install the new version following standard build procedures, or install via package manager (e.g., apt-get install ffmpeg, yum install ffmpeg, brew install ffmpeg).
- 5. Verify the installation by running 'ffmpeg -version' to confirm the new version is active.
- 6. Test any critical video processing workflows to ensure functionality is intact.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-125017 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-125017 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data