CVE-2014-125117
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the my_cgi.cgi component of certain D-Link devices, including the DSP-W215 version 1.02, can be exploited via a specially crafted HTTP POST request to the /common/info.cgi endpoint. This flaw enables an unauthenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution with system-level privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow in the my_cgi.cgi component of D-Link DSP-W215 (v1.02) allows unauthenticated remote code execution via a crafted HTTP POST to /common/info.cgi. The overflow occurs in the web server handling, enabling attackers to overwrite stack memory and execute arbitrary code with system privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.02CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the D-Link device modelAccess the device web interface or check the device label to confirm the exact model number is DSP-W215Affected if The device is not a D-Link DSP-W215 model
-
Check the installed firmware versionLog into the D-Link DSP-W215 web interface and navigate to the Status or Management page to view the firmware version, or use the command 'grep version /etc/os-release' or check the web page source for version stringsAffected if The firmware version is 1.02 exactly
-
Verify the /common/info.cgi endpoint is presentAttempt to access 'http://[device-ip]/common/info.cgi' via HTTP GET request using curl or a browser. If the page loads or responds, the endpoint existsAffected if The endpoint responds with any content (indicating it is enabled and accessible)
-
Confirm network exposure to the vulnerable endpointCheck if the device management interface (port 80/443) is directly accessible from external networks or the internet by reviewing firewall rules, NAT configurations, or port forwarding settingsAffected if The device or /common/info.cgi endpoint is reachable from untrusted networks (WAN/internet) without firewall protection
A defender is affected if they have a D-Link DSP-W215 device running firmware version 1.02 with the /common/info.cgi endpoint accessible on their network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor firmware patch when available; alternatively, restrict network access to the /common/info.cgi endpoint via firewall rules or disable the affected service if not required.
Latest DSP-W215 firmware available from D-Link support site (check for versions beyond 1.02)
- 1. Identify the exact model number (DSP-W215) and current firmware version by logging into the router web interface or checking the device label.
- 2. Visit the official D-Link support page at support.dlink.com and search for DSP-W215 firmware downloads.
- 3. Download the latest available firmware version from D-Link's official website - do not use third-party sources.
- 4. Access the router's web administration interface and navigate to the Firmware Upgrade or System section.
- 5. Upload the downloaded firmware file and allow the upgrade process to complete (typically 2-5 minutes).
- 6. After reboot, verify the new firmware version is installed and test that basic router functions work correctly.
- 7. If no newer firmware is available from D-Link, consider replacing the device as it may be end-of-life and no longer receiving security updates.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-125117 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-125117 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data