C54apm FirmwareOperating system · Conceptronic

CVE-2014-1405

MEDIUM · 5.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-01-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
67/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Multiple open redirect vulnerabilities on the Conceptronic C54APM access point with runtime code 1.26 allow remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via (1) the submit-url parameter in a Refresh action to goform/formWlSiteSurvey or (2) the wlan-url parameter to goform/formWlanSetup.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Open redirect vulnerabilities exist in the web interface of the Conceptronic C54APM access point (runtime code 1.26). Attackers can manipulate the submit-url parameter in the /goform/formWlSiteSurvey endpoint and the wlan-url parameter in /goform/formWlanSetup to redirect users to attacker-controlled URLs, facilitating phishing attacks.

MitigationImplement strict allowlist-based URL validation on the submit-url and wlan-url parameters to ensure redirects only point to relative paths or trusted domains. If the device is no longer supported by the vendor, replace with a current model.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
C54apm FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 1.26
C54apmHardware / appliance
Affected:= v2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device model
    Locate the physical access point or check network inventory for the device hostname, MAC address OUI, or management interface to confirm the model is Conceptronic C54APM
    Affected if The device is not a Conceptronic C54APM - different models are not affected by this CVE
  2. Check the firmware version
    Access the device web management interface and look for a Firmware Version, Software Version, or Runtime Code field typically found under Status, System, or Administration pages. Alternatively, check via CLI if telnet/ssh access is available using commands like 'version' or 'cat /proc/version'
    Affected if The firmware version is NOT 1.26 (or device version is NOT v2) - only version 1.26/v2 is affected
  3. Verify the web interface is enabled
    Attempt to access the device HTTP management portal on the default IP (commonly 192.168.1.1 or as configured). Check if the login page or status page responds
    Affected if The web interface is disabled or inaccessible - the vulnerability cannot be exploited without the web interface being available

A defender is affected only if they have a Conceptronic C54APM running firmware version 1.26 (or v2) with the web interface enabled, as the open redirect exists in those specific form handlers.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict allowlist-based URL validation on the submit-url and wlan-url parameters to ensure redirects only point to relative paths or trusted domains. If the device is no longer supported by the vendor, replace with a current model.

Fix this in C54apm Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-1405 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-1405 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data