CVE-2014-1512
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUse-after-free vulnerability in the TypeObject class in the JavaScript engine in Mozilla Firefox before 28.0, Firefox ESR 24.x before 24.4, Thunderbird before 24.4, and SeaMonkey before 2.25 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by triggering extensive memory consumption while garbage collection is occurring, as demonstrated by improper handling of BumpChunk objects.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceUse-after-free vulnerability in the TypeObject class of Mozilla's JavaScript engine allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by triggering excessive memory consumption during garbage collection, causing improper handling of BumpChunk objects and subsequent memory corruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 28.0>= 24.0, < 24.4= 7.0= 8.0= 12.04= 12.10= 13.10= 5.0= 6.0= 6.5= 5.0= 6.0= 6.5= 6.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Firefox is installedLook for Firefox in the system: on Linux check /usr/bin/firefox or run 'which firefox'; on Windows check Program Files folders; on macOS check /Applications folder.Affected if Firefox is not found on the system, then the user is not affected by this browser vulnerability.
-
Identify the installed Firefox versionRun 'firefox --version' from command line, or in Firefox go to Help > About Firefox. On Linux systems, also check the package manager: 'dpkg -l firefox' (Debian/Ubuntu) or 'rpm -qa firefox' (RHEL).Affected if The version command fails or Firefox is not found, indicating it is not installed.
-
Compare installed version against vulnerable rangesCheck if the installed version is either: 24.0, 24.1, 24.2, or 24.3 (any version >= 24.0 but < 24.4), OR any version below 28.0 that is not in the 24.x ESR range. For ESR versions, also check if it is < 24.4.Affected if The installed Firefox version is 24.0 through 24.3 inclusive, or any version below 28.0 that is not patched (not 24.4+, 28.0+, or later).
-
Verify if browser JavaScript engine is in useThe vulnerability affects the JavaScript engine during garbage collection. Any use of JavaScript in Firefox (web browsing, extensions, etc.) can trigger the vulnerable code path.Affected if Firefox with a vulnerable version is actively used to process JavaScript content.
A user is affected if they have Firefox installed with version 24.0-24.3 or any version below 28.0 that is not patched to 24.4+ or 28.0+.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped24.428.0
Apply vendor updates: upgrade to Firefox 28.0+, Firefox ESR 24.4+, Thunderbird 24.4+, or SeaMonkey 2.25+ to patch the vulnerability.
Firefox 28.0 or later (or Firefox ESR 24.4 or later)
- 1. Verify current Firefox version by navigating to Help > About Firefox
- 2. Close all Firefox instances
- 3. Download Firefox 28.0 or later from the official Mozilla website (mozilla.org/firefox) or use your system's package manager
- 4. For package manager update: Run 'apt-get update && apt-get upgrade firefox' on Debian/Ubuntu, or 'yum update firefox' on Enterprise Linux
- 5. For manual download: Install the downloaded package and restart Firefox
- 6. Verify the upgrade by checking Help > About Firefox shows version 28.0 or higher, or ESR 24.4 or higher
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-1512 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- bugzilla.mozilla.org
- www.mozilla.org
- bugzilla.mozilla.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- www.debian.org
- www.debian.org
- www.oracle.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- security.gentoo.org
- archives.neohapsis.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-1512 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data