CVE-2014-1806
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe .NET Remoting implementation in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4, 4.5, and 4.5.1 does not properly restrict memory access, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors involving malformed objects, aka "TypeFilterLevel Vulnerability."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe .NET Remoting implementation in multiple Microsoft .NET Framework versions fails to properly restrict memory access during deserialization of objects. Attackers can send malformed objects that, when deserialized by a vulnerable server, allow arbitrary code execution due to insufficient TypeFilterLevel filtering.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.1= 2.0= 3.5= 3.5.1= 4.0= 4.5= 4.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed .NET Framework versionCheck the Windows registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v\Full\Version or use 'Get-ItemProperty' PowerShell cmdlet against HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v\FullAffected if The installed version matches 1.1, 2.0, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4.0, 4.5, or 4.5.1
-
Determine if .NET Remoting server is in useSearch application config files (app.config, machine.config) for '<system.runtime.remoting>' sections, and review running services or applications that expose .NET Remoting endpoints via TcpServerChannel or HttpServerChannelAffected if .NET Remoting server channels are configured and exposed to the network or untrusted clients
-
Inspect TypeFilterLevel configurationReview remoting channel configuration in config files or code for 'typeFilterLevel' attribute on <channel> elements; check if it is explicitly set to 'Full' or if it remains at the default settingAffected if TypeFilterLevel is not explicitly set to 'Full' (or is set to 'Low') on a Remoting server that handles deserialization of client-supplied objects
A system is affected if it runs any of the listed .NET Framework versions AND exposes a .NET Remoting server endpoint with TypeFilterLevel not explicitly configured to Full, allowing deserialization of untrusted objects.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Microsoft security updates for CVE-2014-1806 to all affected .NET Framework installations. If immediate patching is not feasible, disable or restrict .NET Remoting services and ensure proper network isolation.
Upgrade to .NET Framework 4.8 (or latest supported version) on Windows Server 2019+ / Windows 10+ for long-term support; migrate away from .NET Remoting to WCF or modern APIs
- Identify the exact .NET Framework version installed on each affected system using Registry Editor (HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\vXXXX\Version)
- Apply Microsoft Security Bulletin MS14-026 patch: KB2958732 for all affected .NET Framework versions
- For .NET Framework 1.1 SP1: Install KB2931476 (Security Update for .NET Framework 1.1 SP1)
- For .NET Framework 2.0 SP2: Install KB2932079 (Security Update for .NET Framework 2.0 SP2)
- For .NET Framework 3.5: Install KB2931356 (Security Update for .NET Framework 3.5)
- For .NET Framework 3.5.1: Install KB2931357 (Security Update for .NET Framework 3.5.1 on Windows 7/Server 2008 R2)
- For .NET Framework 4 and 4.5.x: Install KB2958732 (Security Update for .NET Framework 4/4.5/4.5.1)
- Restart affected systems after applying patches
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-1806 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-1806 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data