CVE-2014-2075
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedTIBCO Enterprise Administrator 1.0.0 and Enterprise Administrator SDK 1.0.0 do not properly enforce administrative authentication requirements, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceTIBCO Enterprise Administrator 1.0.0 and Enterprise Administrator SDK 1.0.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where administrative authentication requirements are not properly enforced, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the affected system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.0= 1.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if TIBCO Enterprise Administrator is installedSearch the system for TIBCO Enterprise Administrator installation directories or check for TIBCO-related processes running on common admin ports (typically ports in the 8000-9000 range or the default TEIA port)Affected if The software is found running or installed on the system
-
Determine the installed version of TIBCO Enterprise AdministratorCheck the product version through the administration console, product documentation, or installation metadata files (commonly found in the installation root directory or via product-specific version query commands)Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0.0 for either Tibco Enterprise Administrator or Tibco Enterprise Administrator SDK
-
Verify if the administrative web interface is accessibleAttempt to access the TIBCO Enterprise Administrator web console (typically via HTTP/HTTPS on the configured admin port) without providing credentialsAffected if The admin console is accessible without being prompted for authentication, indicating the authentication bypass is present
-
Check network exposure of the admin interfaceReview firewall rules and network configuration to determine if the administrative port is exposed to untrusted networks or the internetAffected if The admin interface port is open to untrusted network segments or external IP addresses
You are affected if TIBCO Enterprise Administrator or its SDK version 1.0.0 is installed and the administrative interface is accessible, as the authentication bypass allows unauthenticated command execution.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patches or upgrade to a patched version of TIBCO Enterprise Administrator. If no patch is available, restrict network access to administrative interfaces and monitor for unauthorized administrative access attempts.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-2075 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-2075 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data