Cisco Ons 15454 System SoftwareOperating system · Cisco

CVE-2014-2142

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-04-12
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 10.0 or later.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cisco ONS 15454 controller cards with software 10.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (card reload) via a crafted HTTP URI, aka Bug ID CSCun06870.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The vulnerability exists in Cisco ONS 15454 controller cards running software version 10.0 or earlier. Attackers can trigger a denial of service by sending a specially crafted HTTP URI request to the affected device, causing the controller card to reload and interrupt services.

MitigationUpgrade Cisco ONS 15454 controller card software to a version newer than 10.0 (e.g., 10.1 or later) that addresses this vulnerability. If upgrades are not immediately feasible, restrict HTTP access to these devices using network segmentation or firewall rules to prevent untrusted external access.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Cisco Ons 15454 System SoftwareOperating system
Affected:= 9.0= 9.1= 9.2= 9.2.1= 9.2.2= 9.3= 9.4= 9.6
Ons 15454 System SoftwareOperating system
Affected:<= 10.0= 9.8
Ons 15454Hardware / appliance
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Cisco ONS 15454 hardware
    Log into the device or check inventory to confirm the device model is Cisco ONS 15454. This vulnerability affects controller cards in this specific optical networking platform.
    Affected if Device is not a Cisco ONS 15454 system - the vulnerability does not apply.
  2. Retrieve software version from controller card
    Access the controller card CLI or web interface and retrieve the running software version. In the CLI, this is typically shown via 'show version' or similar command. The version appears as a number like 9.x or 10.x.
    Affected if Unable to retrieve version - verify access to the controller card.
  3. Compare version against affected range
    Compare the installed version to the affected list: 9.0, 9.1, 9.2, 9.2.1, 9.2.2, 9.3, 9.4, 9.6, 9.8, or any version 10.0 or earlier.
    Affected if Version is 10.0 or earlier (9.0 through 10.0 inclusive) - the device is running a vulnerable version.
  4. Verify HTTP service is enabled
    Check the controller card configuration to see if HTTP or web management interface is enabled. This is typically found in the device web interface settings or via 'show running-config' looking for HTTP service configuration.
    Affected if HTTP is disabled or blocked, the attack surface may be reduced but the vulnerable code still exists in the software.

A user is affected if they have a Cisco ONS 15454 controller card running software version 10.0 or earlier with HTTP service enabled, as the specially crafted HTTP URI request can trigger a controller reload.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 10.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Cisco ONS 15454 controller card software to a version newer than 10.0 (e.g., 10.1 or later) that addresses this vulnerability. If upgrades are not immediately feasible, restrict HTTP access to these devices using network segmentation or firewall rules to prevent untrusted external access.

Fix this in Cisco Ons 15454 System Software Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-2142 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-2142 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data