Cns Network RegistrarApplication · Cisco

CVE-2014-2155

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-04-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The DHCPv6 server module in Cisco CNS Network Registrar 7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon reload) via a malformed DHCPv6 packet, aka Bug ID CSCuo07437.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The DHCPv6 server module in Cisco CNS Network Registrar 7.1 contains a vulnerability where processing malformed DHCPv6 packets triggers an uncontrolled daemon reload, causing denial of service. Attackers send specially crafted packets remotely without authentication, leading to service interruption.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patches for Cisco CNS Network Registrar 7.1 (Bug ID CSCuo07437). If no patch is available, consider network-level filtering of anomalous DHCPv6 traffic or disabling DHCPv6 if not required, until a fix is deployed.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Cns Network RegistrarApplication
Affected:= 7.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Cisco CNS Network Registrar is installed
    Locate the installation directory or check installed software on the system. Typical locations may include /opt/cisco/ncn or C:\Program Files\Cisco\Network Registrar on Windows. Check for the 'nrnmd' or 'cnr' processes running.
    Affected if Cisco CNS Network Registrar software is present on the system
  2. Verify the installed version is 7.1
    Use the product's CLI interface (nrcmd) or check the version information via the administrative interface. Run 'nrcmd -N -C show version' or check the installed package version through the system package manager if available.
    Affected if The installed version equals exactly 7.1 (version 7.1 is the only affected version)
  3. Confirm DHCPv6 server module is enabled
    Check the Cisco CNS Network Registrar configuration for DHCPv6 server settings. Use the nrcmd CLI with commands like 'dhcpv6 list' or 'dhcpv6 show' to determine if the DHCPv6 service is active and configured.
    Affected if DHCPv6 server is enabled and processing DHCPv6 requests
  4. Check for daemon crash or reload events
    Review system logs, Cisco CNS Network Registrar logs, or the Windows Event Log for entries indicating unexpected daemon reloads, crashes, or service interruptions. Look for patterns around DHCPv6 packet processing times.
    Affected if The daemon has crashed or reloaded unexpectedly, especially when processing DHCPv6 traffic

The environment is affected if Cisco CNS Network Registrar version 7.1 is installed with the DHCPv6 server module enabled and processing DHCPv6 traffic.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patches for Cisco CNS Network Registrar 7.1 (Bug ID CSCuo07437). If no patch is available, consider network-level filtering of anomalous DHCPv6 traffic or disabling DHCPv6 if not required, until a fix is deployed.

Fix this in Cns Network Registrar Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,060
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-2155 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-2155 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data