CVE-2014-2864
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in PaperThin CommonSpot before 7.0.2 and 8.x before 8.0.3 allow remote attackers to have an unspecified impact via a filename parameter containing directory traversal sequences.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in PaperThin CommonSpot CMS allow remote attackers to traverse directories using '..' sequences in the filename parameter, potentially enabling unauthorized access to sensitive files outside the web root.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 7.0.1= 8.0.0= 8.0.1= 8.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if PaperThin CommonSpot CMS is installedReview web application fingerprinting logs, scan for CommonSpot HTTP response signatures (look for 'CommonSpot' in headers or footer content), or check the application inventory for this CMSAffected if CommonSpot CMS is found in the environment
-
Determine the installed CommonSpot versionAccess the CommonSpot admin interface, check the About page, or query the version endpoint if known. Compare the version number against the affected ranges: versions <= 7.0.1, or exactly 8.0.0, 8.0.1, or 8.0.2Affected if The installed version matches <= 7.0.1 or equals 8.0.0, 8.0.1, or 8.0.2
-
Locate endpoints accepting filename parametersReview application URL patterns and parameter usage for any feature that accepts a filename for file retrieval, download, or display operations. Common patterns include 'filename=', 'file=', or similar query parametersAffected if Endpoints accepting filename parameters are found and accessible without authentication
-
Test for directory traversal vulnerabilitySend a crafted request with '..' sequences in the filename parameter (for example: ../../../../etc/passwd or ../../../config/) to identified endpoints and observe if the application returns files outside the web rootAffected if The application returns file contents from directories outside the intended web root, confirming the traversal flaw is exploitable
The environment is affected if PaperThin CommonSpot CMS versions 7.0.1 or earlier, or versions 8.0.0 through 8.0.2 are running and endpoints accepting filename parameters are accessible without proper input sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to CommonSpot 7.0.2 or 8.0.3 or later to obtain the vendor patch. As a temporary control, implement strict input validation on filename parameters to reject traversal sequences and consider deploying a WAF rule to block '..' in requests.
Commonspot 7.0.2 or later (7.x branch); Commonspot 8.0.3 or later (8.x branch)
- 1. Identify the current Commonspot Content Server version in use by checking the server configuration or administration console.
- 2. If running version 7.0.1 or earlier, plan upgrade to Commonspot 7.0.2 or later.
- 3. If running version 8.0.0, 8.0.1, or 8.0.2, plan upgrade to Commonspot 8.0.3 or later.
- 4. Review PaperThin Commonspot upgrade documentation and release notes for the target version.
- 5. Perform a full backup of the Commonspot application, configuration files, and database before upgrading.
- 6. Test the upgrade in a staging environment to verify functionality.
- 7. Apply the upgrade in production during a planned maintenance window.
- 8. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number and testing key functionality.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-2864 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-2864 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data