Smartcloud Control DeskApplication · Ibm

CVE-2014-3024

MEDIUM · 6.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-08-29
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
66/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.1 through 7.1.1.12 and 7.5 through 7.5.0.6 and Maximo Asset Management 7.5.0 through 7.5.0.3 and 7.5.1 through 7.5.1.2 for SmartCloud Control Desk allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Maximo Asset Management allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users by tricking them into submitting malicious requests.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing endpoints and validate Origin/Referer headers to prevent cross-site request forgery attacks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Smartcloud Control DeskApplication
Affected:= 7.5.0.0= 7.5.0.1= 7.5.0.2= 7.5.0.3= 7.5.1.0= 7.5.1.1= 7.5.1.2
Maximo Asset ManagementApplication
Affected:= 7.1= 7.1.1= 7.1.1.1= 7.1.1.2= 7.1.1.5= 7.1.1.6= 7.1.1.7= 7.1.1.8= 7.1.1.9= 7.1.1.10= 7.1.1.11= 7.1.1.12

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
Single
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed Maximo Asset Management version
    Access the Maximo system information page or check the version from the Maximo login screen, typically found under Help > About or in the system administration module
    Affected if The version matches any of: 7.1, 7.1.1, 7.1.1.1, 7.1.1.2, 7.1.1.5, 7.1.1.6, 7.1.1.7, 7.1.1.8, 7.1.1.9, 7.1.1.10, 7.1.1.11, or 7.1.1.12
  2. Identify the installed Smartcloud Control Desk version
    Access the system information or about page within the Smartcloud Control Desk web interface
    Affected if The version matches any of: 7.5.0.0, 7.5.0.1, 7.5.0.2, 7.5.0.3, 7.5.1.0, 7.5.1.1, or 7.5.1.2
  3. Verify the web application interface is accessible
    Confirm that the Maximo or Smartcloud Control Desk web interface is reachable via browser over HTTP/HTTPS
    Affected if The web interface is exposed to users or network attackers who could trick authenticated users into visiting malicious pages
  4. Inspect form submissions for anti-CSRF tokens
    Log into the web interface, create or modify a record (such as creating a new asset or changing a setting), and inspect the HTML source of the form submission to check for a unique token parameter
    Affected if Form submissions lack a hidden token or unique identifier that would prevent cross-site request forgery
  5. Check for Origin or Referer header validation
    Submit a crafted request from an external domain and verify whether the server rejects it due to missing or unexpected Origin/Referer headers
    Affected if The server accepts requests without validating the Origin or Referer header, allowing cross-origin requests to succeed

You are affected if you run any of the listed versions AND your web interface is accessible to users or potential attackers who could trick authenticated users into submitting malicious requests.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing endpoints and validate Origin/Referer headers to prevent cross-site request forgery attacks.

Fix this in Smartcloud Control Desk Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation32.0 h
  • Testing16.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
64.0 hours of engineering $11,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $17,920.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-3024 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-3024 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data