CVE-2014-3060
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability on the IBM WebSphere DataPower XC10 appliance 2.5 allows remote attackers to obtain administrative privileges by leveraging access to an eXtreme Scale distributed ObjectGrid network and capturing a session cookie.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe vulnerability allows remote attackers with access to the IBM WebSphere eXtreme Scale distributed ObjectGrid network to capture session cookies and obtain administrative privileges on the WebSphere DataPower XC10 appliance version 2.5. This is a privilege escalation issue stemming from insufficient session protection on the ObjectGrid communication channel.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.5.0.0all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the DataPower XC10 appliance model and firmware versionAccess the DataPower XC10 administrative console or use the CLI command 'show version' to retrieve the firmware version. Confirm the appliance model is WebSphere DataPower XC10.Affected if The firmware version is 2.5.0.0 or if the appliance is a DataPower XC10 (all versions are listed as affected) and ObjectGrid communication is enabled.
-
Verify ObjectGrid feature is enabledCheck the DataPower XC10 configuration for ObjectGrid (distributed caching) settings. In the administrative console, navigate to ObjectGrid > ObjectGrid Configuration or inspect the configuration files for 'objectgrid' or 'ObjectGrid' entries.Affected if ObjectGrid is enabled and configured for distributed caching operations.
-
Inspect ObjectGrid network listener configurationReview the ObjectGrid transport configuration to identify listening ports and network bindings. Use CLI command 'show running-config objectgrid' or check the ObjectGrid configuration XML files.Affected if ObjectGrid is listening on network interfaces that may be accessible beyond trusted boundaries.
-
Check session cookie security settings for ObjectGridExamine the ObjectGrid session management configuration for cookie attributes. Look for 'secure', 'httponly', or session protection settings in the ObjectGrid deployment descriptor or configuration.Affected if Session cookies are not protected with secure attributes or there is insufficient session protection on the ObjectGrid channel.
A user is affected if they are running a DataPower XC10 appliance with ObjectGrid enabled and accessible, where session cookies on the ObjectGrid communication channel lack proper protection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade the DataPower XC10 appliance to a patched version and implement network segmentation to restrict access to the ObjectGrid network, along with implementing secure session management practices.
- Review the IBM support document at http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21685705 for the specific patch or firmware update addressing CVE-2014-3060
- Apply the vendor-provided patch or firmware update to the WebSphere DataPower XC10 appliance
- After patching, verify that the eXtreme Scale ObjectGrid network access controls are properly configured to prevent unauthorized session cookie capture
- Test that administrative authentication functions correctly after the patch is applied
- Confirm that only authorized administrators have access to the ObjectGrid distributed network
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,816.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-3060 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-3060 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data