JavaApplication · Ibm

CVE-2014-3065

MEDIUM · 6.9 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-12-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Unspecified vulnerability in IBM Java Runtime Environment (JRE) 7 R1 before SR2 (7.1.2.0), 7 before SR8 (7.0.8.0), 6 R1 before SR8 FP2 (6.1.8.2), 6 before SR16 FP2 (6.0.16.2), and before SR16 FP8 (5.0.16.8) allows local users to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to the shared classes cache.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM Java Runtime Environment versions prior to the specified SR/FP updates contain an unspecified vulnerability in the shared classes cache functionality that allows local users to execute arbitrary code. The attack vector is local (AV:L), requiring the attacker to have some level of access to the affected system.

MitigationUpgrade IBM JRE to version 7 R1 SR2 (7.1.2.0) or later, 7 SR8 (7.0.8.0) or later, 6 R1 SR8 FP2 (6.1.8.2) or later, 6 SR16 FP2 (6.0.16.2) or later, or 5 SR16 FP8 (5.0.16.8) or later.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
JavaApplication
Affected:= 5.0.0.0= 5.0.11.0= 5.0.11.1= 5.0.11.2= 5.0.12.0= 5.0.12.1= 5.0.12.2= 5.0.12.3= 5.0.12.4= 5.0.12.5= 5.0.13.0= 5.0.14.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify IBM Java installation
    Run 'java -version' or check for IBM JRE/JDK binaries in common locations such as /opt/ibm/java, /usr/lib/jvm/ibm*, or Windows equivalents under C:\Program Files\IBM\Java. Look for IBM-specific banner output.
    Affected if IBM Java is installed and the output shows an IBM-specific version string rather than Oracle/OpenJDK.
  2. Determine exact IBM Java version
    Execute 'java -version 2>&1' and capture the full version string. For IBM Java 5, look for versions in the 5.0.x series such as 5.0.0.0 through 5.0.14.0, including SR and FP designations like SR16 FP8.
    Affected if The installed version matches any of: 5.0.0.0, 5.0.11.0, 5.0.11.1, 5.0.11.2, 5.0.12.0, 5.0.12.1, 5.0.12.2, 5.0.12.3, 5.0.12.4, 5.0.12.5, 5.0.13.0, or 5.0.14.0.
  3. Verify shared classes cache is in use
    Search for shared class cache files in the system. On Unix/Linux check for .idx files in /tmp or the java.io.tmpdir, or run 'java -XshowSettings:all 2>&1 | grep -i share' to display shared class cache settings. On Windows check user temp directories for .idx files created by IBM Java.
    Affected if Shared classes cache is enabled and .idx cache files exist, as this is the vulnerable component. The vulnerability requires the shared classes cache functionality to be active.

You are affected if IBM Java 5.0.x versions up to 5.0.14.0 are installed AND the shared classes cache feature is in use on the local system.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade IBM JRE to version 7 R1 SR2 (7.1.2.0) or later, 7 SR8 (7.0.8.0) or later, 6 R1 SR8 FP2 (6.1.8.2) or later, 6 SR16 FP2 (6.0.16.2) or later, or 5 SR16 FP8 (5.0.16.8) or later.

Fix this in Java Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $890
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-3065 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-3065 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data