DpkgApplication · Debian

CVE-2014-3127

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-05-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
dpkg 1.15.9 on Debian squeeze introduces support for the "C-style encoded filenames" feature without recognizing that the squeeze patch program lacks this feature, which triggers an interaction error that allows remote attackers to conduct directory traversal attacks and modify files outside of the intended directories via a crafted source package. NOTE: this can be considered a release engineering problem in the effort to fix CVE-2014-0471.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

dpkg 1.15.9 on Debian squeeze added support for C-style encoded filenames in source packages, but the squeeze patch program lacks this capability. This version mismatch creates an interaction error where the patch program fails to properly handle the new encoding, allowing directory traversal sequences in crafted source packages to escape intended extraction boundaries and write files outside the target directory.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patches that restore compatibility between dpkg and the squeeze patch program, or upgrade to a patched dpkg version that either disables C-style encoding or includes a compatible patch implementation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
DpkgApplication
Affected:= 1.16.0= 1.16.0.1= 1.16.0.2= 1.16.0.3= 1.16.1= 1.16.1.1= 1.16.1.2= 1.16.2= 1.16.3= 1.16.4= 1.16.4.1= 1.16.4.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed dpkg version
    Run 'dpkg --version' or 'dpkg -l dpkg' to retrieve the installed dpkg version number
    Affected if The reported version matches one of the affected versions: 1.16.0, 1.16.0.1, 1.16.0.2, 1.16.0.3, 1.16.1, 1.16.1.1, 1.16.1.2, 1.16.2, 1.16.3, 1.16.4, 1.16.4.1, or 1.16.4.2
  2. Verify dpkg-source component version
    Run 'dpkg-source --version' to check the version of the dpkg-source (patch program) component
    Affected if The dpkg-source version is earlier than 1.16.5 and does not include the C-style encoding compatibility fix
  3. Confirm source package extraction usage
    Inspect logs or automation that runs 'dpkg-source -x' or equivalent commands to extract Debian source packages
    Affected if Your environment processes Debian source packages (.dsc files) using dpkg-source on a regular or automated basis
  4. Check for C-style encoding in use
    Review any Debian source packages you extract to see if they contain filenames with C-style escape sequences (e.g., paths with backslash-escaped characters)
    Affected if You extract source packages that use C-style encoded filenames, which trigger the vulnerable code path in the squeeze patch program

You are affected if you run any of the listed dpkg versions (1.16.0 through 1.16.4.2) and process Debian source packages containing C-style encoded filenames.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patches that restore compatibility between dpkg and the squeeze patch program, or upgrade to a patched dpkg version that either disables C-style encoding or includes a compatible patch implementation.

Fix this in Dpkg Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-3127 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-3127 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data