Espace MeetingApplication · Huawei

CVE-2014-3222

HIGH · 7.0 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-04-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
72/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In Huawei eSpace Meeting with software V100R001C03SPC201 and the earlier versions, attackers that obtain the permissions assigned to common users can elevate privileges to access and set specific key resources.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Huawei eSpace Meeting V100R001C03SPC201 and earlier versions contains a privilege escalation vulnerability where common users can elevate their permissions to access and modify restricted administrative resources. This is a vertical privilege escalation allowing standard users to reach higher-privilege functionality.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patches or upgrade to a patched version of eSpace Meeting. If patches are unavailable, restrict network access to the application and implement additional access controls at the network layer.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Espace MeetingApplication
Affected:<= v100r001c03spc201

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify eSpace Meeting installation path
    Locate the Huawei eSpace Meeting installation directory, typically found under C:\Program Files\Huawei\eSpace Meeting or /opt/huawei/espace-meeting on Linux systems. Check for version files or the main executable properties.
    Affected if Installation directory cannot be located or the application is not installed.
  2. Determine installed version
    Right-click on the main executable (eSpaceMeeting.exe or similar) and select Properties, then view the Version tab. Alternatively, check for a version.txt or release note file in the installation directory.
    Affected if The version displayed is v100r001c03spc201 or any version number earlier than it.
  3. Verify admin interface accessibility
    Log in to the eSpace Meeting web interface using a standard (non-administrative) user account. Attempt to access administrative URLs or functions such as /admin, /system settings, or user management panels.
    Affected if A standard user account can successfully access or modify administrative settings, resources, or functions without proper authorization.
  4. Check for privilege escalation indicators
    Review application logs (typically in a logs subdirectory within the installation folder) for events where standard users accessed privileged operations, or examine the application's session/token validation mechanism if accessible.
    Affected if Logs show standard users successfully performing administrative actions, or the application lacks proper role-based access control (RBAC) enforcement.

A system is affected if the installed eSpace Meeting version is at or below v100r001c03spc201 and standard users can access administrative functions.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patches or upgrade to a patched version of eSpace Meeting. If patches are unavailable, restrict network access to the application and implement additional access controls at the network layer.

Fix this in Espace Meeting Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-3222 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-3222 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data