Unified Cdm Application SoftwareApplication · Cisco

CVE-2014-3300

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-07-07
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 8.1.4 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The BVSMWeb portal in the web framework in Cisco Unified Communications Domain Manager (CDM) in Unified CDM Application Software before 10 does not properly implement access control, which allows remote attackers to modify user information via a crafted URL, aka Bug ID CSCum77041.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The BVSMWeb portal in Cisco Unified Communications Domain Manager (CDM) fails to properly implement access control checks, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to modify user information via crafted URLs. This is an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) or authorization bypass vulnerability in the web framework where direct object references are not validated against the user's session or permissions.

MitigationUpgrade to Unified CDM Application Software version 10 or later. As a compensating control, restrict network access to the management portal using firewall rules or VPN access to limit exposure to untrusted networks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Unified Cdm Application SoftwareApplication
Affected:<= 8.1.4= 8.1
Unified Communications Domain ManagerApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Cisco Unified CDM installation
    Locate Cisco Unified Communications Domain Manager or CDM Application Software on the system. Check for installation directories, services, or documentation that confirms the product is present.
    Affected if The software is not installed, the check is not applicable.
  2. Determine installed version
    Check the installed version of Cisco Unified CDM Application Software. Common locations include installation logs, version files in the application directory, or the web interface login page version display.
    Affected if Version is 8.1, 8.1.4, or any version <= 8.1.4, or if the product is Cisco Unified Communications Domain Manager of any version.
  3. Locate BVSMWeb portal endpoint
    Identify if the BVSMWeb portal web component is present. Check for web service configuration files, application server settings, or by attempting to access common BVSMWeb portal paths on the server.
    Affected if The BVSMWeb portal is not present, the check is not applicable.
  4. Verify portal accessibility
    Determine if the BVSMWeb portal is network-accessible. Check firewall rules, network configuration, or test access to the portal URL from an untrusted network perspective.
    Affected if The portal is exposed to untrusted networks without authentication requirements, making exploitation possible.

You are affected if Cisco Unified CDM Application Software version 8.1 through 8.1.4 (or any version of Cisco Unified Communications Domain Manager) is installed with the BVSMWeb portal accessible to unauthenticated users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 8.1.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Unified CDM Application Software version 10 or later. As a compensating control, restrict network access to the management portal using firewall rules or VPN access to limit exposure to untrusted networks.

Fix this in Unified Cdm Application Software Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-3300 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-3300 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data