CVE-2014-3320
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple open redirect vulnerabilities in the admin web interface in the web framework in Cisco Unified Communications Domain Manager (CDM) 8.1(.4) and earlier allow remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via crafted URLs for unspecified scripts, aka Bug ID CSCuo48835.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple open redirect vulnerabilities in the admin web interface of Cisco Unified Communications Domain Manager (CDM) 8.1(.4) and earlier allow remote attackers to craft malicious URLs that redirect users to arbitrary external websites for phishing attacks via unspecified scripts in the web framework.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 8.1\(.4\)= 8.1= 8.1\(.1\)= 8.1\(.2\)= 8.1\(.3\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco CDM installationLocate Cisco Unified Communications Domain Manager in your environment by checking for the web service listening on common admin ports (typically 443/https or 8080). Use network scanning or check service inventory for Cisco CDM processes.Affected if Cisco CDM software is found running in the environment
-
Determine installed versionAccess the admin web interface and navigate to the About or System Information page to retrieve the exact version number. Alternatively, check installed packages or VM image metadata if CDM is deployed on a virtual appliance.Affected if Version is 8.1, 8.1(1), 8.1(2), 8.1(3), 8.1(4), or any version <= 8.1(4)
-
Verify admin web interface is accessibleConfirm the Cisco CDM admin web interface is reachable over the network, either internally or externally. Attempt to access the login page via HTTP/HTTPS.Affected if The admin web interface is exposed and reachable
-
Test for open redirect behaviorCraft a test URL using the vulnerable redirect pattern: append a redirect parameter (such as ?url= or ?redirect=) with an external domain (e.g., example.com) to admin interface login or script URLs. Observe whether the application redirects to the external site without validation.Affected if The application redirects to the specified external domain without validating the redirect target
The environment is affected if Cisco CDM version 8.1 through 8.1(4) is running with its admin web interface accessible, allowing unvalidated redirect parameters to cause external redirects.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version of Cisco CDM; implement strict URL validation and allowlist controls for redirect parameters in the affected admin web interface scripts.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,720.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-3320 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-3320 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data