Unified Communications Domain ManagerApplication · Cisco
CVE-2014-3339
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the administrative web interface in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CM) and Cisco Unified Presence Server (CUPS) allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via crafted input to unspecified pages, aka Bug ID CSCup74290.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple SQL injection vulnerabilities exist in the administrative web interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CM) and Cisco Unified Presence Server (CUPS). Remote authenticated users can execute arbitrary SQL commands via crafted input to unspecified pages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Unified Communications Domain ManagerApplication
all versions
Unified Presence ServerApplication
all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Cisco productAccess the administrative web interface or use system inventory tools to determine if the system is running Cisco Unified Communications Domain Manager or Cisco Unified Presence ServerAffected if The system is either Cisco Unified Communications Domain Manager or Cisco Unified Presence Server (all versions)
-
Confirm administrative web interface statusCheck if the administrative web interface service is running and accessible on the network (typically ports 443, 8443, or similar HTTPS ports)Affected if The administrative web interface is exposed and reachable
-
Review web server logs for SQL injection patternsExamine access logs for the administrative web interface for suspicious SQL-like patterns such as UNION SELECT, OR 1=1, DROP TABLE, or other SQL commands in URL parametersAffected if Unusual SQL syntax appears in request parameters
-
Check for unauthorized administrative accountsReview the list of administrative users in the system for accounts that were not created by legitimate administratorsAffected if Unexpected or unauthorized administrator accounts exist
If the system runs Cisco Unified Communications Domain Manager or Cisco Unified Presence Server with an accessible administrative web interface, the environment is potentially affected by CVE-2014-3339 and logs should be inspected for SQL injection indicators.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Cisco security patches for CSCup74290 when available. Restrict administrative web interface access to authorized personnel only and monitor for suspicious SQL-like queries in logs.
Fix this in Unified Communications Domain Manager
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-3339 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-3339 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data