CVE-2014-3348
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe SSH module in the Integrated Management Controller (IMC) before 2.3.1 in Cisco Unified Computing System on E-Series blade servers allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (IMC hang) via a crafted SSH packet, aka Bug ID CSCuo69206.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe SSH module in Cisco's Integrated Management Controller (IMC) before version 2.3.1 on Unified Computing System E-Series blade servers contains a denial-of-service vulnerability. A remote attacker can send a specially crafted SSH packet that causes the IMC to hang, rendering the management interface unavailable. This affects the out-of-band management functionality critical for blade server administration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.2.2all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the UCS E-Series blade server modelAccess the CIMC or IMC web interface or CLI and locate the server model identifier (E140d, E140dp, E140s M1/M2, E160d, E160dp, or En120s M2). This information is typically found in the Hardware Summary or Server Properties page.Affected if The server model is any of the following: E140d, E140dp, E140s M1, E140s M2, E160d, E160dp, or En120s M2 (these models are all affected regardless of version).
-
Access the IMC firmware versionLog into the Cisco Integrated Management Controller (IMC) web interface or CLI. Navigate to the Firmware Management or Software Version page to retrieve the current IMC firmware version.Affected if The IMC firmware version is 2.2.2 or earlier.
-
Verify SSH is enabled on IMCIn the IMC web interface, go to Network Settings or Services and confirm the SSH service is enabled. Alternatively, from the IMC CLI run 'show services' to list enabled services.Affected if SSH is enabled and accessible on the IMC management interface (this is the attack vector).
Your environment is affected if you run a Cisco UCS E-Series blade server (E140d, E140dp, E140s M1/M2, E160d, E160dp, or En120s M2) with IMC firmware version 2.2.2 or earlier and have SSH enabled on the IMC interface.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade the IMC firmware to version 2.3.1 or later to remediate this vulnerability. As an interim control, restrict access to the management network by placing IMC interfaces on a dedicated management VLAN with ACLs limiting SSH access to authorized administration hosts.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-3348 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-3348 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data