CVE-2014-3354
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco IOS 12.0, 12.2, 12.4, 15.0, 15.1, 15.2, and 15.3 and IOS XE 2.x and 3.x before 3.7.4S; 3.2.xSE and 3.3.xSE before 3.3.2SE; 3.3.xSG and 3.4.xSG before 3.4.4SG; and 3.8.xS, 3.9.xS, and 3.10.xS before 3.10.1S allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via malformed RSVP packets, aka Bug ID CSCui11547.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe vulnerability allows remote attackers to cause Cisco IOS and IOS XE devices to reload (denial of service) by sending malformed RSVP (Resource Reservation Protocol) packets. This affects multiple IOS and IOS XE version families across versions 12.0 through 15.3 and several XE branches.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.0= 12.2= 12.4= 15.0= 15.1= 15.2= 15.3= 2.1= 2.1.0= 2.1.1= 2.1.2= 2.2= 2.2.1= 2.2.2= 2.2.3= 2.3= 2.3.0= 2.3.1= 2.3.1tCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device OS and versionRun the command 'show version' on the Cisco device to obtain the iOS or IOS XE version numberAffected if The device runs Cisco IOS or IOS XE and the version falls within the affected ranges (12.0, 12.2, 12.4, 15.0, 15.1, 15.2, 15.3 for iOS, or 2.1.x through 2.3.1t for IOS XE)
-
Verify RSVP is enabled on the deviceRun 'show ip rsvp' or check the configuration with 'show running-config | include rsvp' to determine if RSVP is configuredAffected if RSVP is enabled or configured on the device - the vulnerability only affects devices where RSVP is actively running
-
Check which interfaces have RSVP enabledRun 'show ip rsvp interface' to list all interfaces with RSVP protocol enabledAffected if RSVP is enabled on any interface, exposing that interface to malformed RSVP packet attacks
A device is affected only if it runs a vulnerable Cisco IOS or IOS XE version AND has RSVP enabled on the system or at least one interface.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the appropriate Cisco IOS/IOS XE software updates as specified in the Cisco advisory. If patching is not immediately feasible, consider filtering or rate-limiting RSVP traffic at network borders to reduce attack surface.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-3354 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-3354 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data