CVE-2014-3379
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco IOS XR 5.1 and earlier on Network Convergence System 6000 devices allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NPU and card hang or reload) via a malformed MPLS packet, aka Bug ID CSCuq10466.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA denial of service vulnerability in Cisco IOS XR 5.1 and earlier on Network Convergence System 6000 (NCS 6000) devices allows remote attackers to send malformed MPLS packets that cause the NPU (Network Processing Unit) and line cards to hang or force a reload. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of MPLS packet headers upon processing.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.0= 3.0= 3.0.1= 3.1= 3.1.0= 3.2= 3.2.1= 3.2.2= 3.2.4= 3.2.50= 3.3= 3.3.1all versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:A/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelRun 'show platform' or check hardware inventory to confirm the device is a Cisco Network Convergence System 6000 (NCS 6000) or NCS 6008, or run 'show version' to identify the IOS XR softwareAffected if Device model is NCS 6000 or NCS 6008, or software is Cisco IOS XR
-
Check IOS XR versionRun 'show version' command to display the installed Cisco IOS XR versionAffected if Version is 2.0, 3.0, 3.0.1, 3.1, 3.1.0, 3.2, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.4, 3.2.50, 3.3, or 3.3.1, or for NCS 6000/6008 any version (all versions affected)
-
Verify MPLS is enabledRun 'show mpls interfaces' or 'show running-config mpls' to check if MPLS is configured on any interfaceAffected if MPLS is enabled and processing traffic on any interface
You are affected if you run Cisco IOS XR versions 2.0 through 3.3.1, or any NCS 6000/6008 version, with MPLS enabled and processing traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Cisco IOS XR to a version later than 5.1 that includes the fix for Bug ID CSCuq10466. If immediate patching is not possible, consider implementing ACLs or traffic filtering at network edges to drop malformed MPLS packets before they reach affected devices.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-3379 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-3379 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data