CVE-2014-3389
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe VPN implementation in Cisco ASA Software 7.2 before 7.2(5.15), 8.2 before 8.2(5.51), 8.3 before 8.3(2.42), 8.4 before 8.4(7.23), 8.6 before 8.6(1.15), 9.0 before 9.0(4.24), 9.1 before 9.1(5.12), 9.2 before 9.2(2.6), and 9.3 before 9.3(1.1) does not properly implement a tunnel filter, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain failover-unit access via crafted packets, aka Bug ID CSCuq28582.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe VPN tunnel filter implementation in Cisco ASA Software contains a flaw that allows authenticated remote users to bypass intended access restrictions and gain unauthorized access to failover unit infrastructure via specifically crafted packets. This represents a privilege escalation vulnerability in the VPN subsystem.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.2.5= 7.2.5.10= 8.2.5= 8.2.5.13= 8.2.5.22= 8.2.5.26= 8.2.5.33= 8.2.5.41= 8.2.5.46= 8.2.5.48= 8.2.5.49= 8.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine Cisco ASA software versionExecute the command 'show version' on the ASA CLI and locate the software version string (typically displayed in the first few lines)Affected if The version matches one of the following: 7.2.5, 7.2.5.10, 8.2.5, 8.2.5.13, 8.2.5.22, 8.2.5.26, 8.2.5.33, 8.2.5.41, 8.2.5.46, 8.2.5.48, 8.2.5.49, or 8.3.x
-
Identify VPN tunnel filter configurationExecute 'show run | include tunnel-filter' or 'show run all tunnel-filter' to display any configured tunnel filtersAffected if Any tunnel-filter configuration entries are returned, indicating the vulnerable feature is active
-
Verify active VPN tunnel-group configurationsExecute 'show run tunnel-group' to list all configured tunnel groups, and review whether any tunnel-group includes tunnel-filter policy attachmentsAffected if Tunnel groups exist and are associated with tunnel-filter policies that govern packet filtering for VPN sessions
-
Confirm VPN access control list bindingsReview the configuration with 'show run | include access-list' and cross-reference with tunnel-filter applied to VPN interfaces using 'show run interface' or 'show vpn-sessiondb'Affected if VPN access-lists or filter policies are bound to VPN tunnel interfaces, enabling the bypass condition for authenticated remote users
You are affected if your Cisco ASA runs any of the listed vulnerable versions AND has VPN tunnel-filter policies configured, which allows authenticated remote users to escalate privileges and access failover unit infrastructure.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Cisco ASA Software to version 7.2(5.15), 8.2(5.51), 8.3(2.42), 8.4(7.23), 8.6(1.15), 9.0(4.24), 9.1(5.12), 9.2(2.6), or 9.3(1.1) or later. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict VPN access to trusted users and monitor for anomalous failover-unit access attempts.
ASA 7.2.x → 7.2(5.15)+; ASA 8.2.x → 8.2(5.51)+ (or migrate to newer branches 8.4/9.x for additional features)
- 1. Identify current ASA software version using 'show version' command
- 2. Determine the appropriate fixed release based on your current version branch from Cisco advisory CVE-2014-3389
- 3. For ASA 7.2.x: upgrade to 7.2(5.15) or later
- 4. For ASA 8.2.x: upgrade to 8.2(5.51) or later
- 5. For newer branches, upgrade to 8.4(7.23), 9.0(4.24), 9.1(5.12), 9.2(2.6), or 9.3(1.1) respectively as listed in the advisory
- 6. Back up the current ASA configuration before upgrading
- 7. Test the upgrade in a lab/staging environment if possible
- 8. Download the fixed software from Cisco.com (requires valid service contract)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-3389 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-3389 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data