Ios XrOperating system · Cisco

CVE-2014-3396

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-10-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cisco IOS XR on ASR 9000 devices does not properly use compression for port-range and address-range encoding, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended Typhoon line-card ACL restrictions via transit traffic, aka Bug ID CSCup30133.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cisco IOS XR on ASR 9000 devices contains a flaw in how the Typhoon line-card processes ACLs with port-range and address-range encoding. The compression mechanism used for these ranges is improper, allowing transit traffic to bypass configured ACL restrictions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send specially crafted packets that circumvent intended access controls.

MitigationApply the Cisco IOS XR software update for Bug ID CSCup30133 when available. In the interim, implement compensating controls such as additional filtering at upstream devices or alternative ACL implementations that avoid the vulnerable encoding patterns.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ios XrOperating system
Affected:all versions
Asr 9000 Rsp440 RouterHardware / appliance
Affected:all versions
Asr 9001Hardware / appliance
Affected:all versions
Asr 9006Hardware / appliance
Affected:all versions
Asr 9010Hardware / appliance
Affected:all versions
Asr 9904Hardware / appliance
Affected:all versions
Asr 9912Hardware / appliance
Affected:all versions
Asr 9922Hardware / appliance
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify device model and confirm it is an ASR 9000 series
    Run 'show platform' or 'show version' to confirm the hardware is an ASR 9000, ASR 9001, ASR 9006, ASR 9010, ASR 9904, ASR 9912, or ASR 9922
    Affected if Device is not one of the listed ASR 9000 series models, then not affected by this specific CVE
  2. Verify Cisco IOS XR is the running OS
    Run 'show version' and confirm the OS is Cisco IOS XR
    Affected if Device does not run IOS XR, then not affected by this CVE
  3. Identify Typhoon line-cards in use
    Run 'show platform' or 'show controller fabric' to identify if Typhoon line-cards are installed
    Affected if No Typhoon line-cards present, then not affected (vulnerability is specific to Typhoon line-card ACL processing)
  4. Check for ACLs with port-range or address-range configurations
    Run 'show access-lists' and review ACL entries for 'range' keywords in port or address specifications
    Affected if No ACLs configured with port-range or address-range encoding, then not vulnerable to this specific bypass vector

The device is affected only if it is an ASR 9000 series running IOS XR with Typhoon line-cards and has ACLs configured using port-range or address-range encoding.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Cisco IOS XR software update for Bug ID CSCup30133 when available. In the interim, implement compensating controls such as additional filtering at upstream devices or alternative ACL implementations that avoid the vulnerable encoding patterns.

Fix this in Ios Xr Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-3396 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-3396 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data