JenkinsApplication

CVE-2014-3663

MEDIUM · 6.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-10-16
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 3.1 or later.
See remediation →
66/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Jenkins before 1.583 and LTS before 1.565.3 allows remote authenticated users with the Job/CONFIGURE permission to bypass intended restrictions and create or destroy arbitrary jobs via unspecified vectors.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Jenkins before 1.583 and LTS before 1.565.3 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability where authenticated users with only Job/CONFIGURE permission (intended to allow configuring existing jobs) can bypass restrictions to create new jobs or destroy existing arbitrary jobs, enabling privilege escalation beyond intended access controls.

MitigationUpgrade Jenkins to version 1.583 or later (or LTS 1.565.3 or later) to remediate this authorization bypass vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
JenkinsApplication
Affected:<= 1.565.2<= 1.582
OpenshiftApplication
Affected:<= 3.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
Single
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Jenkins version
    Navigate to Manage Jenkins > About Jenkins or run: java -jar jenkins.war --version. Alternatively, check the version displayed on the login page or in the footer of the Jenkins web interface.
    Affected if The installed version is Jenkins <= 1.565.2 (LTS) or Jenkins <= 1.582 (weekly release), or Openshift Enterprise/Gear 3.1 or earlier that bundles Jenkins.
  2. Verify authorization strategy
    Go to Manage Jenkins > Configure Global Security. Check the 'Authorization' section to see which authorization strategy is selected (Matrix-based security, Project-based Matrix Authorization Strategy, or Legacy mode).
    Affected if Matrix-based or Project-based Matrix authorization is configured with separate Job/CONFIGURE permissions granted to users who do NOT have Job/CREATE permissions.
  3. Review user permission matrix
    In the authorization configuration, examine the permission matrix for each user or group. Specifically look for Job/CONFIGURE permission granted without corresponding Job/CREATE permission.
    Affected if Users or groups have Job/CONFIGURE permission enabled but lack Job/CREATE permission, creating the vulnerability condition.
  4. Audit job creation logs
    Check Jenkins logs (Manage Jenkins > System Log) and the 'audit trail' plugin if installed, for JobCreation events. Look for job creation events by users who should not have create permissions.
    Affected if New jobs exist that were created by users who only have Job/CONFIGURE permission in the authorization matrix.
  5. Audit job deletion logs
    Review Jenkins logs and audit trail for Job deletion events. Look for Job/DESTROY events from users who should not have delete permissions on those jobs.
    Affected if Jobs have been deleted by users who only have Job/CONFIGURE permission and should not have Job/DELETE access to those jobs.

A user is affected if running Jenkins version 1.565.2 or earlier (LTS) or 1.582 or earlier (weekly), and the authorization matrix grants Job/CONFIGURE permission separately from Job/CREATE, allowing privilege escalation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 3.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Jenkins to version 1.583 or later (or LTS 1.565.3 or later) to remediate this authorization bypass vulnerability.

Fix this in Jenkins Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,390
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-3663 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-3663 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data