LibgaduApplication

CVE-2014-3775

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-05-22
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.11.4 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
libgadu before 1.11.4 and 1.12.0 before 1.12.0-rc3, as used in Pidgin and other products, allows remote Gadu-Gadu file relay servers to cause a denial of service (memory overwrite) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted message.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A memory corruption vulnerability in libgadu library allows remote Gadu-Gadu file relay servers to send crafted messages that overwrite memory, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution. The flaw exists in versions before 1.11.4 and 1.12.0-rc3.

MitigationUpgrade libgadu to version 1.11.4 or later (stable branch) or 1.12.0-rc3 or later (development branch). Verify that all products using libgadu (including Pidgin) are rebuilt against the patched library.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
LibgaduApplication
Affected:<= 1.11.4= 1.12.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate libgadu library files
    Search for libgadu shared library files on the system using commands like 'find /usr -name "libgadu*" -type f' or check package manager listings
    Affected if No libgadu library files are found - the library is not installed and the system is not affected
  2. Determine installed libgadu version
    Run 'pkg-config --modversion libgadu' or check the library file version with 'ldd' if linked, or query the package manager (dpkg -l libgadu, rpm -q libgadu)
    Affected if Version is 1.11.4 or lower, OR version is exactly 1.12.0 (the 1.12.0 release, not rc3)
  3. Identify applications using libgadu
    Check for applications that link to libgadu such as Pidgin, Finch, or other instant messaging clients. Use 'ldd /path/to/binary | grep gadu' or check package dependencies
    Affected if Applications using libgadu are present on the system
  4. Verify Gadu-Gadu protocol is enabled
    In client applications like Pidgin, check if the Gadu-Gadu protocol plugin is loaded or if any Gadu-Gaddy accounts are configured. Inspect client configuration files in ~/.purple/ or similar
    Affected if Gadu-Gaddy accounts exist or the protocol is actively configured for use
  5. Check for incoming file relay connections
    Monitor network connections or inspect application logs for activity from Gadu-Gaddy file relay servers. Review any established connections to Gadu-Gaddy servers
    Affected if Connections to Gadu-Gaddy file relay servers are active or expected in the environment

A system is affected if it has libgadu version 1.11.4 or lower, or exactly version 1.12.0, AND uses an application with Gadu-Gaddy protocol enabled that can receive file relay connections from remote servers.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.11.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade libgadu to version 1.11.4 or later (stable branch) or 1.12.0-rc3 or later (development branch). Verify that all products using libgadu (including Pidgin) are rebuilt against the patched library.

Fix this in Libgadu Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,472.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-3775 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-3775 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data