CVE-2014-3816
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJuniper Junos 11.4 before 11.4R12, 12.1 before 12.1R11, 12.1X44 before 12.1X44-D35, 12.1X45 before 12.1X45-D30, 12.1X46 before 12.1X46-D20, 12.1X47 before 12.1X47-D10, 12.2 before 12.2R8-S2, 12.3 before 12.3R7, 13.1 before 13.1R4-S2, 13.2 before 13.2R5, 13.3 before 13.3R2-S2, and 14.1 before 14.1R1 allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges via unspecified combinations of CLI commands and arguments.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceJuniper Junos contains a privilege escalation vulnerability allowing remote authenticated users to gain elevated privileges through unspecified CLI command and argument combinations. The vulnerability affects multiple version branches from 11.4 through 14.1, and is rated high severity (CVSS 9) due to the complete privilege escalation capability available to authenticated attackers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.4= 12.1= 12.1x44= 12.1x45= 12.1x46= 12.1x47= 12.2= 12.3= 13.1= 13.2= 13.3= 14.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Junos is installedRun 'show version' or 'show version detail' on the device CLI to identify the operating systemAffected if The device is not running Juniper Junos (not affected)
-
Identify the Junos base versionParse the output of 'show version' to find the base version number (e.g., 11.4, 12.1, 12.2, 13.1, 13.2, 13.3, or 14.1)Affected if The base version falls within 11.4 through 14.1 and is not at or above the fixed patch levels listed in the advisory (potentially affected)
-
Determine the exact Junos build versionCheck the full version string from 'show version' (e.g., 11.4R12, 12.1R11, 12.2R8-S2, 13.2R5, 14.1R1) and compare against the fixed versions provided in the advisoryAffected if The installed build is earlier than 11.4R12, 12.1R11, 12.1X44-D35, 12.1X45-D30, 12.1X46-D20, 12.1X47-D10, 12.2R8-S2, 12.3R7, 13.1R4-S2, 13.2R5, 13.3R2-S2, or 14.1R1 (vulnerable)
-
Verify remote access authentication is enabledCheck configuration with 'show configuration system services' to confirm remote access services (ssh, web, etc.) are configuredAffected if Remote authentication is enabled - the vulnerability affects remote authenticated users, so this configuration is required for the attack surface to exist
A user is affected if their Junos device runs a version between 11.4 and 14.1 that is earlier than the specific fixed patch levels for their branch, AND remote authentication services are enabled on the device.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Junos to versions 11.4R12, 12.1R11, 12.1X44-D35, 12.1X45-D30, 12.1X46-D20, 12.1X47-D10, 12.2R8-S2, 12.3R7, 13.1R4-S2, 13.2R5, 13.3R2-S2, or 14.1R1 and later as appropriate for the deployed platform.
Upgrade to the fixed release for your branch: 11.4R12, 12.1R11, 12.1X44-D35, 12.1X45-D30, 12.1X46-D20, 12.1X47-D10, 12.2R8-S2, 12.3R7, 13.1R4-S2, 13.2R5, 13.3R2-S2, or 14.1R1
- Identify the currently installed Junos version using 'show version' command
- Determine which branch your version belongs to (11.4, 12.1, 12.1X44, 12.1X45, 12.2, 12.3, 13.1, 13.2, 13.3, or 14.1)
- Download the appropriate fixed release for your branch from the Juniper downloads page: 11.4R12, 12.1R11, 12.1X44-D35, 12.1X45-D30, 12.1X46-D20, 12.1X47-D10, 12.2R8-S2, 12.3R7, 13.1R4-S2, 13.2R5, 13.3R2-S2, or 14.1R1
- Upload the Junos upgrade package to the device using 'file copy' or FTP/SCP
- Install the upgrade using 'request system software add <package> reboot'
- Verify the upgrade was successful and the new version is installed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-3816 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-3816 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data