CVE-2014-4218
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 5.0u65, 6u75, 7u60, and 8u5 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Libraries.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an older Oracle Java SE vulnerability (CVE-2014-4218) with an 'unspecified' description and 'unknown' attack vectors affecting the Libraries component. It allows remote attackers to affect integrity (but not confidentiality or availability) in Java versions 5.0u65, 6u75, 7u60, and 8u5. The lack of technical specificity in the original advisory makes precise exploitation details unavailable.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.5.0= 1.6.0= 1.7.0= 1.8.0= 1.5.0= 1.6.0= 1.7.0= 1.8.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Java versionRun 'java -version' or 'javac -version' from command line to see the exact version number of Java JRE or JDKAffected if Version matches 1.5.0u65, 1.6.0u75, 1.7.0u60, or 1.8.0u5 (or falls within the 1.5.0, 1.6.0, 1.7.0, 1.8.0 family ranges)
-
Identify Java installation pathOn Windows, check C:\Program Files\Java or C:\Program Files (x86)\Java; on Unix/Linux, check /usr/lib/jvm/ or /usr/java/ directoriesAffected if Any subdirectory contains the affected version families (1.5, 1.6, 1.7, or 1.8) matching the affected update numbers
-
Verify Java is in use by the systemCheck running processes for java.exe (Windows) or java (Unix) or review Java Control Panel (Java > General > About) for the runtime versionAffected if The active Java runtime matches the vulnerable versions listed
System is affected if any installed Java JRE or JDK version is 1.5.0, 1.6.0, 1.7.0, or 1.8.0 matching the specific update numbers 5.0u65, 6u75, 7u60, or 8u5
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate affected Java installations to their latest patched versions. For legacy systems running end-of-life Java 5 or 6, migrate to supported Java versions (7u80+ or 8u) and ensure all deployments receive current Java security updates.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-4218 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.oracle.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- marc.info
- marc.info
- rhn.redhat.com
- seclists.org
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- security.gentoo.org
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www.debian.org
- www.debian.org
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.vmware.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-4218 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data