CVE-2014-4219
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u75, 7u60, and 8u5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Hotspot.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOracle Java SE vulnerability in the Hotspot component affecting versions 6u75, 7u60, and 8u5. The specific vulnerability details are unspecified with unknown attack vectors, but the CVSS 9.3 indicates complete impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.6.0= 1.7.0= 1.8.0= 1.6.0= 1.7.0= 1.8.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Java is installedRun 'java -version' or 'which java' to determine if Java is present on the systemAffected if Java is not installed or not found, then the system is not affected by this specific Java vulnerability
-
Identify the installed Java versionRun 'java -version' and note the full version string (for example: 1.6.0_75, 1.7.0_60, 1.8.0_5)Affected if The version falls within 1.6.0 through 1.6.0_75, 1.7.0 through 1.7.0_60, or 1.8.0 through 1.8.0_5, indicating the system may be affected
-
Confirm the JVM implementation is Oracle HotspotRun 'java -version -verbose' or check the JRE/lib directory for hotspot folders. Oracle Java SE typically uses the Hotspot JVM by defaultAffected if The JVM is Oracle Hotspot and the version falls within the affected range, then the vulnerability applies
-
Check if the Java browser plugin is enabledVerify browser plugin settings in Java Control Panel (Java Plug-in) or examine browser configuration for Java applet supportAffected if Browser plugin is enabled and Java version is in the affected range, the attack surface for this vulnerability is present
If Oracle Java (JDK or JRE) version 1.6.0 through 1.6.0_75, 1.7.0 through 1.7.0_60, or 1.8.0 through 1.8.0_5 using the Hotspot JVM is installed, the environment is affected by CVE-2014-4219
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to a later supported Oracle Java SE version beyond 8u5 that includes the security fix, or apply Oracle's corresponding CPU patch if available for the affected versions.
Java SE 6u81+ / Java SE 7u65+ / Java SE 8u11+ (Oracle Critical Patch Updates)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Java version using 'java -version' command
- 2. Download the appropriate Oracle Critical Patch Update (CPU) for your Java version from oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/
- 3. For Java 1.6.0 (Java 6), upgrade to Java SE 6u81 or later
- 4. For Java 1.7.0 (Java 7), upgrade to Java SE 7u65 or later
- 5. For Java 1.8.0 (Java 8), upgrade to Java SE 8u11 or later
- 6. Uninstall the vulnerable Java version or ensure the new version is the default
- 7. Verify the fix by running 'java -version' and confirming the updated version number
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-4219 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.oracle.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- marc.info
- rhn.redhat.com
- seclists.org
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- security.gentoo.org
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www.debian.org
- www.debian.org
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.vmware.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-4219 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data