CVE-2014-4501
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple stack-based buffer overflows in sgminer before 4.2.2, cgminer before 4.3.5, and BFGMiner before 3.3.0 allow remote pool servers to have unspecified impact via a long URL in a client.reconnect stratum message to the (1) extract_sockaddr or (2) parse_reconnect functions in util.c.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflows in mining software (sgminer, cgminer, BFGMiner) in the extract_sockaddr and parse_reconnect functions in util.c, triggered by a long URL in a client.reconnect stratum message from a malicious pool server, allowing remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 4.2.1= 4.0.0= 4.1.0= 4.1.153= 4.1.242= 4.1.271= 4.2.0<= 4.3.4= 4.3.0= 4.3.1= 4.3.2= 4.3.3<= 3.2.9= 3.2.0= 3.2.1= 3.2.2= 3.2.3= 3.2.4= 3.2.5= 3.2.6= 3.2.7= 3.2.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed mining software and versionRun the miner executable with --version or -V flag. For sgminer: sgminer --version; for cgminer: cgminer --version; for bfgminer: bfgminer --versionAffected if The installed version matches any of these: sgminer <= 4.2.1 (specific versions: 4.0.0, 4.1.0, 4.1.153, 4.1.242, 4.1.271, 4.2.0); cgminer <= 4.3.4 (specific versions: 4.3.0, 4.3.1, 4.3.2, 4.3.3); bfgminer <= 3.2.9 (specific versions: 3.2.0 through 3.2.8)
-
Confirm the software is using stratum miningCheck the miner configuration file or command-line parameters for a stratum pool URL (starts with stratum+tcp://) in the pool URL fieldAffected if The miner is configured to connect to a stratum pool server (the vulnerability is only triggered when the miner acts as a stratum client connecting to a pool)
-
Check for auto-reconnect or client.reconnect featureReview the miner configuration file for options like 'reconnect', 'auto-reconnect', or examine pool configuration settings that control reconnection behavior after a disconnectAffected if Auto-reconnect is enabled; the vulnerability is triggered when the malicious pool sends a client.reconnect message with an excessively long URL
You are affected if you are running an affected version of sgminer, cgminer, or bfgminer AND using stratum mining with auto-reconnect enabled, allowing a malicious pool server to send a long URL that triggers the buffer overflow in extract_sockaddr or parse_reconnect in util.c
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to patched versions (sgminer 4.2.2+, cgminer 4.3.5+, BFGMiner 3.3.0+). If unable to upgrade immediately, use only trusted pools and disable auto-reconnect features.
sgminer: 4.2.2+ | cgminer: 4.3.5+ | BFGMiner: 3.3.0+
- 1. Identify which mining software is in use: sgminer, cgminer, or BFGMiner
- 2. Check the current version of the installed mining software using --version or -V flag
- 3. For sgminer users: Upgrade to version 4.2.2 or later from the official repository
- 4. For cgminer users: Upgrade to version 4.3.5 or later from the official repository (https://github.com/ckolivas/cgminer)
- 5. For BFGMiner users: Upgrade to version 3.3.0 or later from the official repository (https://github.com/luke-jr/bfgminer)
- 6. After upgrade, verify the new version is installed correctly
- 7. Restart the mining software to ensure the patched version is running
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-4501 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-4501 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data