SierraApplication · Iii

CVE-2014-5137

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-09-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Innovative Interfaces Sierra Library Services Platform 1.2_3 provides different responses for login request depending on whether the user account exists, which allows remote attackers to enumerate account names via a series of login requests, possibly related to the Webpac Pro submodule.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Sierra Library Services Platform 1.2_3 returns different HTTP responses or error messages during login authentication depending on whether the supplied username exists in the system. This allows remote attackers to determine valid usernames through repeated login attempts with different username values.

MitigationModify the authentication logic to return identical error messages and HTTP status codes for both invalid usernames and invalid passwords, preventing user enumeration.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SierraApplication
Affected:= 1.2_3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
None
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Sierra Library Services Platform installation
    Check if your web application or library system is running Sierra software. Look for Sierra-specific headers, cookies, or application identifiers in HTTP responses.
    Affected if The system is running Sierra Library Services Platform version 1.2_3
  2. Locate the login authentication endpoint
    Identify the login page or authentication endpoint in your Sierra system. This is typically found at paths like /patroninfo, /auth, or similar login-related URLs.
    Affected if A login endpoint exists that accepts username and password parameters
  3. Test login response with non-existent username
    Submit a login attempt with a clearly invalid username (e.g., 'nonexistentuser123') and a random password. Record the exact HTTP status code and error message returned.
    Affected if The system returns an error message or status code indicating the username does not exist
  4. Test login response with valid username but wrong password
    Submit a login attempt using a known-valid username (or one you suspect exists) with an incorrect password. Record the exact HTTP status code and error message returned.
    Affected if The system returns an error message or status code indicating the password is incorrect
  5. Compare error responses for username enumeration vulnerability
    Compare the error messages and HTTP status codes from steps 3 and 4. Check if they differ in wording, timing, or status codes.
    Affected if The responses differ between non-existent usernames and valid usernames with wrong passwords, allowing an attacker to determine which usernames are valid in the system

Your environment is affected if running Sierra Library Services Platform 1.2_3 and the login returns different error messages for invalid usernames versus invalid passwords, enabling user enumeration.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Modify the authentication logic to return identical error messages and HTTP status codes for both invalid usernames and invalid passwords, preventing user enumeration.

Fix this in Sierra Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-5137 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-5137 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data