InmobiApplication

CVE-2014-5526

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-09-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Inmobi library for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Inmobi library for Android fails to validate X.509 certificates during SSL/TLS handshakes, allowing man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept communications by presenting arbitrary crafted certificates and thereby obtain sensitive information.

MitigationUpdate to a patched version of the Inmobi library that implements proper X.509 certificate chain validation, or implement certificate pinning in the application as a compensating control.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
InmobiApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the Inmobi library in the application
    Decompile the Android APK and search for Inmobi-related files (typically inmobi*.jar, inmobi*.aar, or classes containing 'inmobi' in the package name). Alternatively, examine the app's build configuration (build.gradle, libs folder) for inmobi dependencies.
    Affected if The Inmobi library is present in the application package.
  2. Confirm network traffic uses Inmobi for SSL/TLS connections
    Use a network proxy (such as Burp Suite or OWASP ZAP) to intercept traffic from the Android device or emulator running the app. Look for SSL/TLS connections to Inmobi endpoints (typically *.inmobi.com) that succeed without proper certificate validation failures.
    Affected if The application makes SSL/TLS requests to Inmobi servers and connections are established without certificate validation errors.
  3. Inspect the library code for certificate validation logic
    Decompile the Inmobi library JAR/AAR and examine classes handling HTTPS connections. Look for custom TrustManager,HostnameVerifier, or SSLSocketFactory implementations. Search for code that disables SSL validation (for example, TrustManager that accepts all certificates).
    Affected if The library contains code that bypasses or disables X.509 certificate chain validation.
  4. Test for MITM vulnerability with invalid certificate
    Configure a network proxy with an untrusted or self-signed SSL certificate. Attempt to intercept traffic from the application. If the app successfully connects through the proxy without certificate warnings or failures, validation is not properly enforced.
    Affected if The application accepts invalid or untrusted SSL certificates during MITM testing.

If the Inmobi library is present in the Android application and SSL/TLS connections to Inmobi servers succeed without proper certificate validation (visible through MITM testing or code inspection), the application is affected by CVE-2014-5526.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update to a patched version of the Inmobi library that implements proper X.509 certificate chain validation, or implement certificate pinning in the application as a compensating control.

Fix this in Inmobi Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-5526 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-5526 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data