Counting \& Addition Kids GamesApplication · Ilearnwith

CVE-2014-5555

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-09-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Counting & Addition Kids Games (aka air.com.tribalnova.ilearnwith.ipad.PokoAddEn) application 1.8.1 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Android app 'Counting & Addition Kids Games' version 1.8.1 fails to verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, enabling man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept encrypted communications by presenting a crafted certificate. This allows sensitive information to be captured by spoofing legitimate servers.

MitigationImplement proper SSL certificate validation in the application, preferably through certificate pinning or comprehensive trust store validation to ensure only legitimate server certificates are accepted.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Counting \& Addition Kids GamesApplication
Affected:= 1.8.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify if the vulnerable app is installed
    On the Android device, go to Settings > Apps > Downloaded (or All) and search for 'iLearnWith Counting & Addition Kids Games', or use ADB command: `adb shell pm list packages | grep ilearnwith`
    Affected if The app package name containing 'ilearnwith' and 'counting' is present on the device
  2. Confirm the installed version
    In Settings > Apps > [App Name] > Version, or use ADB: `adb shell dumpsys package [package_name] | grep versionName`
    Affected if The displayed version is exactly 1.8.1
  3. Identify if the app transmits data over network
    Check if the app has network permissions by reviewing its manifest (via `adb shell dumpsys package [package_name] | grep -i permission`) or monitor network traffic while the app is in use
    Affected if The app has INTERNET permission and is used to connect to remote servers, making the SSL validation flaw exploitable

You are affected if the app 'iLearnWith Counting & Addition Kids Games' version 1.8.1 is installed and actively transmits data over the network, allowing sensitive communications to be intercepted via MITM attacks due to missing SSL certificate validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper SSL certificate validation in the application, preferably through certificate pinning or comprehensive trust store validation to ensure only legitimate server certificates are accepted.

Fix this in Counting \& Addition Kids Games Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $3,050
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,880.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-5555 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-5555 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data