CVE-2014-5945
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Edline Mobile (aka com.wEdlineFree) application 0.63.13369.34294 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Edline Mobile Android application (version 0.63.13369.34294) fails to validate X.509 certificates from SSL/TLS servers. This allows man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept communications by presenting a forged certificate, enabling sensitive data exposure and server spoofing.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 0.63.13369.34294CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Edline Mobile versionOn Android device: Go to Settings > Apps > Edline Mobile, or run `adb shell dumpsys package com.edline.mobile` and look for versionName/versionCode. Compare to 0.63.13369.34294.Affected if The installed version exactly matches 0.63.13369.34294 (note: this is an exact version match per the CVE)
-
Confirm app makes network connectionsMonitor network traffic from the device while using the app, or check app permissions for INTERNET access in the manifest.Affected if The app establishes SSL/TLS connections to remote servers (this is the attack surface for the vulnerability)
-
Verify SSL interception is possibleConfigure a proxy with a forged certificate and attempt to intercept traffic from the Edline Mobile app. If the app accepts the untrusted certificate, certificate validation is missing.Affected if The app accepts a forged/manually added certificate without warning or rejection, confirming X.509 validation is disabled
You are affected if Edline Mobile version 0.63.13369.34294 is installed AND the app makes SSL/TLS connections, which can be confirmed by successful certificate interception.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper X.509 certificate validation or certificate pinning in the Android application to ensure all SSL/TLS connections are validated against trusted certificate authorities.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-5945 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-5945 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data