CVE-2014-6048
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedphpMyFAQ before 2.8.13 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary attachments via a direct request.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencephpMyFAQ before version 2.8.13 contains an insecure direct object reference (IDOR) vulnerability allowing remote unauthenticated attackers to read arbitrary attachments via direct URL requests. This indicates missing or inadequate authorization checks on the attachment serving mechanism.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.8.13CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed phpMyFAQ versionLocate the version file or check the admin dashboard for the installed phpMyFAQ version number. Common locations include a VERSION file in the root directory or displayed in the admin panel under System information.Affected if The installed version is lower than 2.8.13
-
Verify attachment feature is enabledCheck the phpMyFAQ configuration to determine if the attachment/upload feature is enabled. This is typically found in the admin configuration settings under the attachments section.Affected if Attachments are enabled and the version is below 2.8.13
-
Confirm attachment directory is web-accessibleInspect the web server configuration and verify that the attachment directory (often named 'attachment' or 'attachments' within the phpMyFAQ installation) is directly accessible via HTTP without authentication. Attempt a direct HTTP request to a known attachment path to confirm public accessibility.Affected if The attachment directory can be accessed directly via URL without authentication
You are affected if phpMyFAQ version is below 2.8.13 AND the attachment feature is enabled AND the attachment directory is directly accessible via web without authorization checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data2.8.13
Upgrade phpMyFAQ to version 2.8.13 or later. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, restrict direct access to the attachment directory via web server configuration (e.g., .htaccess rules or web.config) to prevent unauthorized file access.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-6048 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-6048 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data